...
首页> 外文期刊>Statistics in medicine >Group sequential, sample size re-estimation and two-stage adaptive designs in clinical trials: A comparison
【24h】

Group sequential, sample size re-estimation and two-stage adaptive designs in clinical trials: A comparison

机译:临床试验中的组顺序,样本量重新估计和两阶段自适应设计:比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Recently there have been quite a few enthusiastic discussions on the topic about adaptive designs for clinical trials . Controversies have been generated among authors who favour versus those who do not quite favour adaptive designs (AD). Some of the controversies have involved group sequential (GS) designs, sample size re-estimation (SSR) procedures, and their variants and mixtures. In this commentary I would like to offer some comparisons with respect to the distinct purposes and key operating aspects of these types of designs
机译:最近,关于用于临床试验的自适应设计的话题已经进行了许多热烈的讨论。在赞成与不赞成自适应设计(AD)的作者之间产生了争议。一些争议涉及小组顺序设计(GS),样本大小重新估计(SSR)程序及其变体和混合物。在这篇评论中,我想对这些类型设计的不同目的和关键操作方面进行一些比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号