...
首页> 外文期刊>Statistics in medicine >Modelling the hierarchical structure in datasets with very small clusters: A simulation study to explore the effect of the proportion of clusters when the outcome is continuous
【24h】

Modelling the hierarchical structure in datasets with very small clusters: A simulation study to explore the effect of the proportion of clusters when the outcome is continuous

机译:对具有非常小的聚类的数据集中的层次结构进行建模:一项模拟研究,用于探索结果连续时聚类所占比例的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In cluster-randomised trials, the problem of non-independence within clusters is well known, and appropriate statistical analysis documented. Clusters typically seen in cluster trials are large in size and few in number, whereas datasets of preterm infants incorporate clusters of size two (twins), size three (triplets) and so on, with the majority of infants being in 'clusters' of size one. In such situations, it is unclear whether adjustment for clustering is needed or even possible. In this paper, we compared analyses allowing for clustering (linear mixed model) with analyses ignoring clustering (linear regression). Through simulations based on two real datasets, we explored estimation bias in predictors of a continuous outcome in different size datasets typical of preterm samples, with varying percentages of twins. Overall, the biases for estimated coefficients were similar for linear regression and mixed models, but the standard errors were consistently much less well estimated when using a linear model. Non-convergence was rare but was observed in approximately 5% of mixed models for samples below 200 and percentage of twins 2% or less. We conclude that in datasets with small clusters, mixed models should be the method of choice irrespective of the percentage of twins. If the mixed model does not converge, a linear regression can be fitted, but standard error will be underestimated, and so type I error may be inflated. ? 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:在聚类随机试验中,聚类内的非独立性问题是众所周知的,并记录了适当的统计分析。在聚类试验中通常看到的聚类规模较大,数量很少,而早产儿的数据集包含大小为2(双胞胎),大小为3(三胞胎)等的簇,大多数婴儿处于大小的“簇”一。在这种情况下,不清楚是否需要调整集群甚至是可能的。在本文中,我们将允许聚类的分析(线性混合模型)与忽略聚类的分析(线性回归)进行了比较。通过基于两个真实数据集的模拟,我们探索了在早产样品典型的不同大小的数据集中具有不同双胞胎百分比的连续结果的预测变量中的估计偏差。总体而言,线性回归模型和混合模型的估计系数偏差相似,但是使用线性模型时,标准误差的估计值始终要差得多。不收敛的情况很少见,但在200%以下的样本中,约有5%的混合模型中观察到,而双胞胎的百分比为2%或以下。我们得出的结论是,在具有小聚类的数据集中,无论双胞胎的百分比如何,混合模型都应该是选择的方法。如果混合模型不收敛,则可以拟合线性回归,但是标准误差会被低估,因此I型误差可能会被夸大。 ? 2012年John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号