...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Research Methodology >How large are the consequences of covariate imbalance in cluster randomized trials: a simulation study with a continuous outcome and a binary covariate at the cluster level
【24h】

How large are the consequences of covariate imbalance in cluster randomized trials: a simulation study with a continuous outcome and a binary covariate at the cluster level

机译:聚类随机试验中协变量不平衡的后果有多大:在聚类水平上具有连续结果和二元协变量的模拟研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background The number of clusters in a cluster randomized trial is often low. It is therefore likely random assignment of clusters to treatment conditions results in covariate imbalance. There are no studies that quantify the consequences of covariate imbalance in cluster randomized trials on parameter and standard error bias and on power to detect treatment effects. Methods The consequences of covariance imbalance in unadjusted and adjusted linear mixed models are investigated by means of a simulation study. The factors in this study are the degree of imbalance, the covariate effect size, the cluster size and the intraclass correlation coefficient. The covariate is binary and measured at the cluster level; the outcome is continuous and measured at the individual level. Results The results show covariate imbalance results in negligible parameter bias and small standard error bias in adjusted linear mixed models. Ignoring the possibility of covariate imbalance while calculating the sample size at the cluster level may result in a loss in power of at most 25?% in the adjusted linear mixed model. The results are more severe for the unadjusted linear mixed model: parameter biases up to 100?% and standard error biases up to 200?% may be observed. Power levels based on the unadjusted linear mixed model are often too low. The consequences are most severe for large clusters and/or small intraclass correlation coefficients since then the required number of clusters to achieve a desired power level is smallest. Conclusions The possibility of covariate imbalance should be taken into account while calculating the sample size of a cluster randomized trial. Otherwise more sophisticated methods to randomize clusters to treatments should be used, such as stratification or balance algorithms. All relevant covariates should be carefully identified, be actually measured and included in the statistical model to avoid severe levels of parameter and standard error bias and insufficient power levels.
机译:背景一项集群随机试验中的集群数量通常很少。因此,将簇随机分配给治疗条件可能导致协变量失衡。目前还没有研究能够量化在参数和标准误差偏倚以及检测治疗效果的功效的整群随机试验中协变量失衡的后果。方法通过模拟研究,研究了未调整和调整后的线性混合模型中协方差不平衡的后果。本研究的因素是不平衡程度,协变量效应大小,聚类大小和类内相关系数。协变量是二进制的,并且在聚类级别进行度量;结果是连续的,并在个人水平上进行衡量。结果结果表明,在调整后的线性混合模型中,协变量不平衡导致参数偏差可忽略不计,标准误差偏差较小。在聚类水平上计算样本量时,忽略协变量不平衡的可能性可能会导致在调整后的线性混合模型中功率损失最多为25%。对于未经调整的线性混合模型,结果更为严峻:参数偏差高达100%,标准误差偏差高达200%。基于未经调整的线性混合模型的功率水平通常太低。对于大型群集和/或较小的组内相关系数而言,后果最为严重,因为达到所需功率水平所需的群集数量最少。结论计算聚类随机试验的样本量时应考虑协变量不平衡的可能性。否则,应使用更复杂的方法将簇随机化为治疗方法,例如分层或平衡算法。所有相关的协变量都应仔细识别,实际测量并包括在统计模型中,以避免严重的参数和标准误差偏差水平以及不足的功率水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号