...
首页> 外文期刊>Statistics in medicine >A tree based lack-of-fit test for multiple logistic regression.
【24h】

A tree based lack-of-fit test for multiple logistic regression.

机译:基于树的缺乏适合性的多元Logistic回归测试。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Several omnibus tests have been developed to assess the fit of a regression model. But many of these lack-of-fit tests focus on the simple regression setting. Here, we focus on multiple logistic regression. Pearson's well-known chi-square test statistic and the deviance statistic are no longer valid in the case that the model contains one or more continuous covariates. To overcome this difficulty, Hosmer and Lemeshow proposed a Pearson type statistic based on groups defined by the so-called deciles of risk. We propose a test statistic that is similar in approach to the Hosmer and Lemeshow statistic in that the observations are classified into distinct groups. In the procedure proposed here however, the grouping is not according to probabilities fitted under the null model. We use a recursive partitioning algorithm to divide the sample space into different groups. This generally allows for a more powerful assessment of the model fit. Simulations are carried out to compare the results of the proposed test to that of Hosmer and Lemeshow. Three data examples illustrate the performance of the tree based lack-of-fit test, in comparison to several other tests.
机译:已经开发了几种综合测试来评估回归模型的拟合度。但是,许多缺乏拟合的测试都集中在简单的回归设置上。在这里,我们专注于多元逻辑回归。在模型包含一个或多个连续协变量的情况下,Pearson著名的卡方检验统计量和偏差统计量不再有效。为了克服这个困难,Hosmer和Lemeshow提出了一种Pearson类型的统计量,该统计量基于所谓的风险系数定义的组。我们提出了一种检验统计量,该统计量与Hosmer和Lemeshow统计量的方法相似,因为观测值被分为不同的组。但是,在此处提出的过程中,分组不是根据空模型下拟合的概率进行的。我们使用递归分区算法将样本空间划分为不同的组。通常,这可以对模型拟合进行更强大的评估。进行了仿真,以将建议的测试结果与Hosmer和Lemeshow的结果进行比较。与其他几个测试相比,三个数据示例说明了基于树的不适合测试的性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号