...
首页> 外文期刊>Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal >CAN COGNITIVE BIASES EXPLAIN VENTURE TEAM HOMOPHILY?
【24h】

CAN COGNITIVE BIASES EXPLAIN VENTURE TEAM HOMOPHILY?

机译:认知偏差可以同质地解释风险团队吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although venture teams whose founders are dissimilar (heterophilious) tend to outperform teams whose founders are similar (homophilious), most new venture teams are characterized by homophily. I try to explain this puzzle with a learning model in which founders are prone to two cognitive biases: overoptimism and self-serving attributions. Founders choose cofound-ers with similar beliefs as themselves because they expect this to promote the most effective allocation of effort to the venture. Self-serving bias reinforces and perpetuates these beliefs. In principle, informed outsiders (e.g., practitioners or hands on investors) can improve venture team composition compared with private choices by founders.
机译:尽管创始人不同(异性)的创业团队往往胜过创始人相似(同性)的团队,但是大多数新创团队的特征是同质的。我试图用一种学习模型来解释这个难题,在这种学习模型中,创始人容易出现两种认知偏差:过度乐观和自我服务的归因。创始人选择具有与自己相似信念的联合创始人,因为他们希望这能促进对合资企业最有效的分配。自私自利的偏见巩固并延续了这些信念。原则上,与创始人的私人选择相比,知情的局外人(例如,从业者或动手投资者)可以改善风险团队的组成。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号