...
首页> 外文期刊>Southwestern Entomologist >Using infrared transducers to sense greenbug (Homoptera: Aphididae) infestations in winter wheat
【24h】

Using infrared transducers to sense greenbug (Homoptera: Aphididae) infestations in winter wheat

机译:使用红外换能器感测冬小麦中的绿虫(蚜虫:蚜虫)侵扰

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Winter wheat was grown under four regimes (normally-watered, and not infested, normally-watered and infested, water-stressed but not infested, and infested and water-stressed) to determine if infrared transducers (IRTs) could be used sense greenbug(Schizaphis graminum) infestations and distinguish them from water stress. The IRTs were able to sense temperature differences among plants of the different treatments, and when the IRT data were converted to differences from ambient temperatures, significant differences were found among the treatments. When sampled at 09.00 h, plants undergoing water stress and infested with greenbugs were always significantly warmer (p=0.05) than normally-watered, noninfested plants. Temperatures of plants either water stressed or infested by greenbugs were between these extremes and were not statistically distinguishable from each other. However, on several occasions, they could be distinguished from nonstressed plants and those stressed by both factors. Analysis ofgreenbug abundance and temperature differences between normally-watered and water-stressed plants resulted in two significantly-different regressions that were nearly parallel, indicating that, within natural parameters, there may be a constant ratio between damage by greenbug and water stress in wheat. In conclusion, IRTs were found not to be a tool that can be used alone to distinguish greenbug infestations in winter wheat. Unless certain water stress conditions are met (absence or uniform), there isno practical way to differentiate greenbug infestations from water stress in winter wheat.
机译:冬小麦的生长方式有四种(正常浇水和未侵染,正常浇水和侵染,水分胁迫但不侵染,侵染和水分胁迫),以确定是否可以使用红外传感器(IRT)感测绿虫( Schizaphis graminum)侵扰并将其与水分胁迫区分开来。 IRT能够感应不同处理植物之间的温度差异,当将IRT数据转换为与环境温度的差异时,发现各处理之间存在显着差异。当在09.00 h采样时,遭受水分胁迫并被绿虫侵染的植物总是比正常浇水的未侵染植物温暖(p = 0.05)。水分胁迫或绿虫侵染的植物的温度在这些极端之间,并且在统计学上不能彼此区分。但是,在某些情况下,可以将它们与无胁迫植物以及受这两种因素胁迫的植物区分开。对正常浇水和水分胁迫的植物之间的绿虫丰度和温度差异进行分析后,得出两个接近于平行的显着不同的回归,表明在自然参数范围内,绿虫对小麦的伤害与水分胁迫之间可能存在恒定的比率。总之,IRT并不是单独用来区分冬小麦绿虫侵染的工具。除非满足某些水分胁迫条件(不存在或一致),否则没有实际方法可以将冬虫的绿虫侵扰与水分胁迫区分开。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号