首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? A randomized controlled trial.
【24h】

Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? A randomized controlled trial.

机译:腰椎管狭窄症的手术或非手术治疗?一项随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of decompressive surgery as compared with nonoperative measures in the treatment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: No previous randomized trial has assessed the effectiveness of surgery in comparison with conservative treatment for spinal stenosis. METHODS: Four university hospitals agreed on the classification of the disease, inclusion and exclusion criteria, radiographic routines, surgical principles, nonoperative treatment options, and follow-up protocols. A total of 94 patients were randomized into a surgical or nonoperative treatment group: 50 and 44 patients, respectively. Surgery comprised undercutting laminectomy of the stenotic segments in 10 patients augmented with transpedicular fusion. The primary outcome was based on assessment of functional disability using the Oswestry Disability Index (scale, 0-100). Data on the intensity of leg and back pain (scales, 0-10), as well asself-reported and measured walking ability were compiled at randomization and at follow-up examinations at 6, 12, and 24 months. RESULTS: Both treatment groups showed improvement during follow-up. At 1 year, the mean difference in favor of surgery was 11.3 in disability (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.3-18.4), 1.7 in leg pain (95% CI, 0.4-3.0), and 2.3(95% CI, 1.1-3.6) in back pain. At the 2-year follow-up, the mean differences were slightly less: 7.8 in disability (95% CI, 0.8-14.9) 1.5 in leg pain (95% CI, 0.3-2.8), and 2.1 in back pain (95% CI, 1.0-3.3). Walking ability, either reported or measured, did not differ between the two treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients improved over the 2-year follow-up regardless of initial treatment, those undergoing decompressive surgery reported greater improvement regarding leg pain, back pain, and overall disability. The relative benefit of initial surgical treatment diminished over time, but outcomes of surgery remained favorable at 2 years. Longer follow-up is needed to determine if these differences persist.
机译:研究设计:一项随机对照试验。目的:评估减压手术与非手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的疗效。背景资料摘要:以前没有一项随机试验评估过与保守治疗脊椎狭窄相比手术的有效性。方法:四所大学医院就疾病的分类,纳入和排除标准,影像学检查方法,手术原则,非手术治疗选择和随访方案达成了一致。总共94例患者被随机分为外科或非手术治疗组:分别为50例和44例。手术包括对10例经椎弓根融合加深的患者进行狭窄部分的椎板切除术。主要结果基于使用Oswestry残疾指数(0-100级)对功能性残疾的评估。在随机和随访时的第6、12和24个月,收集有关腿部和背部疼痛强度(等级0-10)以及自我报告和测量的步行能力的数据。结果:两个治疗组在随访期间均显示出改善。 1年时,支持手术的平均差异为:残障率为11.3(95%置信区间[CI],4.3-18.4),腿痛为1.7(95%CI,0.4-3.0),以及2.3(95%CI, 1.1-3.6)背部疼痛。在2年的随访中,平均差异稍小:残疾7.8(95%CI,0.8-14.9),腿痛1.5(95%CI,0.3-2.8),背痛2.1(95%) CI,1.0-3.3)。在两个治疗组之间报告或测量的步行能力没有差异。结论:尽管无论初始治疗如何,患者在两年的随访中均得到改善,但接受减压手术的患者在腿部疼痛,背部疼痛和整体残疾方面有更大的改善。随着时间的流逝,初始手术治疗的相对获益逐渐减少,但手术结局在2年时仍然令人满意。需要更长的随访以确定这些差异是否持续存在。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号