...
首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Two-level anterior cervical discectomy versus one-level corpectomy in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
【24h】

Two-level anterior cervical discectomy versus one-level corpectomy in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

机译:两级前颈椎间盘切除术与一级颈椎切除术治疗颈椎病性脊髓病。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective investigation of clinical and radiologic outcomes after surgical treatment for 2-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). OBJECTIVE: The study was undertaken to compare the outcomes of 2 different anterior approach types for 2-level CSM. Specifically, 2-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) was compared with 1-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The optimal surgical approach for 2-level CSM has not been defined, and thus, the relative merits of 2-level ACDF and 1-level ACCF remain controversial. However, few comparative studies have been conducted on these 2 surgical approaches. METHODS: The authors reviewed the case histories of 31 patients that underwent surgical treatment for 2-level CSM from 2002 to 2006. Cases of myelopathy because of cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament were excluded. Thirty-one patients (16 men and 15 women) of mean age 54.45 +/- 11.6 years (28 approximately 77) were included. The average follow-up period was 26.23 +/- 15.0 months (12 approximately 63). The authors compared perioperative parameters (hospital stays, bleeding amounts, operation times, complications), clinical parameters (Japanese Orthopedic Association scores, Visual Analog Scale scores for neck and arm pain), and radiologic parameters (total cervical range of motion, segmental range of motion, segmental height, cervical lordosis, fusion rate). RESULTS: Of these above parameters, operation time (P = 0.001) and bleeding amount (P = 0.001) were significantly greater in the ACCF group, whereas segmental height (P = 0.018) and postoperative cervical lordosis (P = 0.009) were significantly lower in the ACCF group. However, other parameters were not significantly different in the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Surgical managements of 2-level CSM using ACDF or ACCF were found to be similar in terms of clinical outcomes. However, 2-level ACDF was found to be superior to 1-level ACCF in terms of operation times, bleeding amounts, and radiologic results.
机译:研究设计:回顾性研究2级颈椎病脊髓病(CSM)手术治疗后的临床和放射学结果。目的:本研究旨在比较2种水平CSM的2种不同的前路入路类型的结果。具体来说,比较了2级颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合术(ACDF)与1级颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合术(ACCF)。背景数据概述:2级CSM的最佳手术方法尚未确定,因此2级ACDF和1级ACCF的相对优势仍然存在争议。然而,很少有关于这两种手术方法的比较研究。方法:作者回顾了2002年至2006年接受手术治疗的2例CSM的31例患者的病史。排除了由于颈椎后纵韧带骨化引起的脊髓病病例。纳入平均年龄54.45 +/- 11.6岁的31例患者(男16例,女15例)(其中28例约为77)。平均随访时间为26.23 +/- 15.0个月(12个月约为63)。作者比较了围手术期参数(住院时间,出血量,手术时间,并发症),临床参数(日本骨科协会评分,颈部和手臂疼痛的视觉模拟量表评分)和影像学参数(总颈椎活动范围,运动,节段高度,颈椎前凸,融合率)。结果:在上述参数中,ACCF组的手术时间(P = 0.001)和出血量(P = 0.001)显着增加,而节段高度(P = 0.018)和术后颈椎前凸(P = 0.009)则显着降低在ACCF组中。但是,其他参数在两组中没有显着差异。结论:发现采用ACDF或ACCF进行2级CSM的手术治疗在临床结局方面相似。然而,在手术时间,出血量和放射学结果方面,发现2级ACDF优于1级ACCF。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号