...
首页> 外文期刊>Spinal cord: the official journal of the International Medical Society of Paraplegia >Effects of electrical stimulation-induced gluteal versus gluteal and hamstring muscles activation on sitting pressure distribution in persons with a spinal cord injury
【24h】

Effects of electrical stimulation-induced gluteal versus gluteal and hamstring muscles activation on sitting pressure distribution in persons with a spinal cord injury

机译:电刺激诱发的臀肌与臀肌和绳肌的激活对脊髓损伤患者坐位压力分布的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Study design:Ten participants underwent two electrical stimulation (ES) protocols applied using a custom-made electrode garment with built-in electrodes. Interface pressure was measured using a force-sensitive area. In one protocol, both the gluteal and hamstring (gh) muscles were activated, in the other gluteal (g) muscles only.Objectives:To study and compare the effects of electrically induced activation of gh muscles versus g muscles only on sitting pressure distribution in individuals with a spinal cord injury (SCI).Setting:Ischial tuberosities interface pressure (ITs pressure) and pressure gradient.Results:In all participants, both protocols of g and gh ES-induced activation caused a significant decrease in IT pressure. IT pressure after gh muscles activation was reduced significantly by 34.5% compared with rest pressure, whereas a significant reduction of 10.2% after activation of g muscles only was found. Pressure gradient reduced significantly only after stimulation of gh muscles (49.3%). gh muscles activation showed a decrease in pressure relief (Δ IT) over time compared with g muscles only.Conclusion:Both protocols of surface ES-induced of g and gh activation gave pressure relief from the ITs. Activation of both gh muscles in SCI resulted in better IT pressure reduction in sitting individuals with a SCI than activation of g muscles only. ES might be a promising method in preventing pressure ulcers (PUs) on the ITs in people with SCI. Further research needs to show which pressure reduction is sufficient in preventing PUs.
机译:研究设计:十名参与者接受了两种电刺激(ES)协议,这些协议使用带有内置电极的定制电极衣进行应用。使用力敏感区域测量界面压力。在一种方案中,臀肌和肌(gh)均被激活,而另一臀肌(g)则被激活。目的:研究和比较电刺激gh肌肉与g肌肉的电刺激对坐姿压力分布的影响。设置:坐骨结节界面压力(ITs压力)和压力梯度。结果:在所有参与者中,g和gh ES诱导的激活方案均导致IT压力显着降低。与静止压力相比,gh肌肉激活后的IT压力显着降低了34.5%,而仅激活g肌肉后的IT压力显着降低了10.2%。仅在刺激gh肌肉后,压力梯度才显着降低(49.3%)。与仅使用g肌肉相比,gh肌肉的激活随时间的推移显示出压力释放(ΔIT)的降低。结论:两种表面ES诱导的g和gh激活的方案都可以缓解IT的压力。与仅激活g肌肉相比,激活SCI中的两个gh肌肉可以更好地降低SCI坐着患者的IT压力。 ES可能是预防SCI患者IT上压疮(PU)的一种有前途的方法。进一步的研究需要表明哪种压力降低足以防止PU。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号