首页> 外文期刊>Spinal cord: the official journal of the International Medical Society of Paraplegia >Validity and reliability of the 10-m walk test and the 6-min walk test in spinal cord injury patients.
【24h】

Validity and reliability of the 10-m walk test and the 6-min walk test in spinal cord injury patients.

机译:10米步行测试和6分钟步行测试在脊髓损伤患者中的有效性和可靠性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: The 10-m walk test (10MWT) and the 6-min walk test (6MWT) have been recommended for assessment of walking in spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. The study was designed on test-retest analysis of the 10MWT and 6MWT. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess validity/reliability of different methods of performing the tests. SETTING: The study was set at an SCI unit of a rehabilitation hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 37 patients; whose median age was 58.5 years (interquartile range 40-66, full range 19-77); median time since onset of SCI was 24 months (interquartile range 16.25-70.5, full range 6-109). Non-traumatic etiology in 20 out of 37 patients; level: 12C, 14T and 11L; American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grade: 35D/2C. Assessment with the 10MWT (with or without dynamic start) and the 6MWT (short or long track) by two blinded raters to evaluate inter/intra-rater reliabilities. RESULTS: The 10MWT was performed in a median of 19 s (25th-75th interquartile range 13-28) with the dynamic start and of 18.4 s (25th-75th interquartile range 12.6-29.9) with the static start (P=0.092). The correlation between the results of the two methods was between 0.98 and 0.99. The inter- and intra-rater reliabilities were between 0.95 and 0.99 for both the methods. The 6MWT showed significant differences according to the track length: patients walked a median of 226.7 m (25th-75th interquartile range 123.2-319) on the longer track and of 187.6 m (25th-75th interquartile range 69.7-240.6) on the short one (P<0.001). The correlation between the results of the two methods was between 0.91 and 0.93. The inter- and intra-rater reliabilities were between 0.98 and 0.99. CONCLUSION: The 10MWT shows high inter/intra-rater reliability and shows comparable results with both dynamic and static start. The different testing conditions of the 6MWT (track/turns) results in significant differences that need standardization for use in future trials.
机译:研究设计:推荐使用10米步行测试(10MWT)和6分钟步行测试(6MWT)评估脊髓损伤(SCI)患者的步行。该研究是基于10MWT和6MWT的重测分析设计的。目的:本研究的目的是评估执行测试的不同方法的有效性/可靠性。地点:这项研究是在康复医院的SCI单位进行的。病人和方法:共37例患者。中位年龄为58.5岁(四分位数范围为40-66,全范围范围为19-77);自SCI发作以来的中位时间为24个月(四分位数范围为16.25-70.5,全范围为6-109)。 37例患者中有20例为非创伤性病因;等级:12C,14T和11L;美国脊髓损伤协会损伤量表等级:35D / 2C。由两个盲目评分者使用10MWT(有或没有动态启动)和6MWT(短轨道或长轨道)进行评估,以评估评估者之间/评估者内部的可靠性。结果:10MWT在动态启动时的中位时间为19 s(第25-75个四分位范围13-28),在静态启动时的中位值为18.4 s(第25-75个四分位范围12.6-29.9)(P = 0.092)。两种方法的结果之间的相关性在0.98和0.99之间。两种方法的评定者之间和评定者内部可靠性在0.95和0.99之间。 6MWT在赛道长度上显示出显着差异:患者在较长赛道上行走的中位数为226.7 m(第25-75位四分位数范围123.2-319),在短赛道上行走的中位数为187.6 m(25-75th四分位范围69.7-240.6) (P <0.001)。两种方法的结果之间的相关性在0.91和0.93之间。评定者之间和评定者内部的可靠性在0.98和0.99之间。结论:10MWT具有较高的内部/评估者可靠性,并且在动态和静态启动下均显示出可比的结果。 6MWT的不同测试条件(轨迹/转弯)会导致明显的差异,需要进行标准化才能在以后的试验中使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号