...
首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Adding chiropractic manipulative therapy to standard medical care for patients with acute low back pain: Results of a pragmatic randomized comparative effectiveness study
【24h】

Adding chiropractic manipulative therapy to standard medical care for patients with acute low back pain: Results of a pragmatic randomized comparative effectiveness study

机译:在急性下腰痛患者的标准医疗保健中增加脊骨推拿疗法:一项实用的随机比较有效性研究的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN.: Randomized controlled trial. OBJECTIVE.: To assess changes in pain levels and physical functioning in response to standard medical care (SMC) versus SMC plus chiropractic manipulative therapy (CMT) for the treatment of low back pain (LBP) among 18 to 35-year-old active-duty military personnel. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: LBP is common, costly, and a significant cause of long-term sick leave and work loss. Many different interventions are available, but there exists no consensus on the best approach. One intervention often used is manipulative therapy. Current evidence from randomized controlled trials demonstrates that manipulative therapy may be as effective as other conservative treatments of LBP, but its appropriate role in the healthcare delivery system has not been established. METHODS.: Prospective, 2-arm randomized controlled trial pilot study comparing SMC plus CMT with only SMC. The primary outcome measures were changes in back-related pain on the numerical rating scale and physical functioning at 4 weeks on the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and back pain functional scale (BPFS). RESULTS.: Mean Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire scores decreased in both groups during the course of the study, but adjusted mean scores were significantly better in the SMC plus CMT group than in the SMC group at both week 2 (P < 0.001) and week 4 (P = 0.004). Mean numerical rating scale pain scores were also significantly better in the group that received CMT. Adjusted mean back pain functional scale scores were significantly higher (improved) in the SMC plus CMT group than in the SMC group at both week 2 (P < 0.001) and week 4 (P = 0.004). CONCLUSION.: The results of this trial suggest that CMT in conjunction with SMC offers a significant advantage for decreasing pain and improving physical functioning when compared with only standard care, for men and women between 18 and 35 years of age with acute LBP.
机译:研究设计::随机对照试验。目的:评估18到35岁的活动性腰痛患者对标准医学护理(SMC)与SMC结合脊椎推拿手法(CMT)进行腰背痛(LBP)的治疗后疼痛水平和身体机能的变化。值班军事人员。背景技术概述:LBP是常见的,昂贵的并且是长期病假和工作损失的重要原因。可以使用许多不同的干预措施,但是对于最佳方法尚无共识。经常使用的一种干预措施是操纵疗法。随机对照试验的最新证据表明,手法治疗可能与LBP的其他保守治疗一样有效,但尚未确定其在医疗保健提供系统中的适当作用。方法:前瞻性2臂随机对照试验性试验研究,比较了SMC加CMT和仅SMC。主要的结局指标是在Roland-Morris残疾问卷上的数字评分量表和4周时身体功能的背痛变化以及背痛功能量表(BPFS)。结果:在研究过程中,两组的Roland-Morris残疾问卷平均得分均下降,但SMC + CMT组的校正后平均得分在第2周和第2周均显着优于SMC组(P <0.001) 4(P = 0.004)。在接受CMT的组中,平均数字量表评分疼痛评分也明显更好。在第2周(P <0.001)和第4周(P = 0.004),SMC加CMT组的校正后背痛功能量表评分均显着高于(改善)。结论:该试验的结果表明,与仅标准治疗相比,CMT与SMC结合对18至35岁急性LBP的男性和女性而言,在减轻疼痛和改善身体机能方面具有显着优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号