首页> 外文期刊>Spine >A comparison of three types of postoperative pain control after posterior lumbar spinal surgery.
【24h】

A comparison of three types of postoperative pain control after posterior lumbar spinal surgery.

机译:腰椎后路手术后三种术后疼痛控制的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, nonrandomized, comparative study. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the early postoperative analgesic effects and the postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) associated with three methods of pain control after posterior lumbar spinal surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The use of opioids for postoperative pain control is common after spinal surgery; however, PONV is the most frequently encountered side effect, and it is yet to be overcome. The effectiveness of the use of an absorbable low-dose morphine-soaked microfibrillar collagen hemostatic sponge placed on the surface of the dural sac (epidural MMCHS) was compared to patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and intermittent intramuscular bolus injection of meperidine for postoperative pain control after spine surgery. METHODS: One hundred sixty-five patients who underwent short-segment posterior lumbar spinal decompression and fusion surgery between January 2007 and July 2007 in the orthopedic department of a medical center were enrolled. For postoperative pain control, 40 patients received epidural MMCHS, 48 patients received PCA, and 77 patients received meperidine injection. Patient ratings of pain intensity (visual analog scale score from 0 [no pain] to 10 [most severe pain]), nausea (from 0 [no nausea] to 5 [severe nausea]), and vomiting (from 0 [no vomiting] to 5 [severe vomiting]) were recorded at 4 hours postoperation and on postoperative days 1, 2, and 3. RESULTS: The analgesic effect was enhanced significantly in both epidural MMCHS group and the PCA group as compared with the meperidine group on postoperative days 1 and 2 (P < 0.05). On postoperative days 1, 2, and 3, PONV was more severe in the PCA group than in the other two groups (P < 0.05). The side effects of epidural MMCHS were nausea (25%), pruritus (12.5%), vomiting (5%), and hypotension (2.5%). CONCLUSION: A single low-dose epidural MMCHS is effective for postoperative pain control and minimizes the occurrence of PONV after posterior lumbar spinal surgery.
机译:研究设计:回顾性,非随机,比较研究。目的:比较腰椎后路手术后三种镇痛方法的早期术后镇痛效果和术后恶心呕吐(PONV)。背景资料摘要:脊柱外科手术后通常使用阿片类药物来控制术后疼痛。但是,PONV是最常遇到的副作用,并且有待克服。将可吸收的,低剂量吗啡浸泡的微纤维胶原蛋白止血海绵在硬膜囊表面(硬膜上腔MMCHS)的使用与患者自控镇痛(PCA)和间断性肌注大剂量哌替啶治疗术后疼痛的效果进行了比较脊柱手术后的控制。方法:纳入2007年1月至2007年7月在医学中心骨科进行短节段后路腰椎减压和融合手术的165例患者。对于术后疼痛控制,40例接受硬膜外MMCHS,48例接受PCA,77例接受哌替啶注射。病人对疼痛强度(视觉模拟评分从0 [无疼痛]至10 [最严重疼痛]),恶心(从0 [无恶心]至5 [严重恶心])和呕吐(从0 [无呕吐]的评分)术后4小时以及术后1、2和3天记录到5〜5次[严重呕吐]。结果:与硬膜外组相比,硬膜外MMCHS组和PCA组的镇痛效果均显着增强1和2(P <0.05)。术后第1、2和3天,PCA组的PONV较其他两组严重(P <0.05)。硬膜外MMCHS的副作用为恶心(25%),瘙痒(12.5%),呕吐(5%)和低血压(2.5%)。结论:单个小剂量硬膜外MMCHS可有效控制术后疼痛,并最大程度减少后路腰椎脊柱手术后PONV的发生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号