...
首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Percutaneous lumbar pedicle screw placement aided by computer-assisted fluoroscopy-based navigation: Perioperative results of a prospective, comparative, multicenter study
【24h】

Percutaneous lumbar pedicle screw placement aided by computer-assisted fluoroscopy-based navigation: Perioperative results of a prospective, comparative, multicenter study

机译:基于计算机辅助透视的导航辅助经皮腰椎椎弓根螺钉置入术:一项前瞻性,比较性,多中心研究的围手术期结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN.: Institutional review board-approved, prospective, multicenter, comparative study. OBJECTIVE.: To assess the accuracy and utility of a computer-assisted fluoroscopic navigation method for percutaneous placement of lumbar pedicle screws compared with conventional fluoroscopic placement. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: Recent reports indicate that cortical breaches during percutaneous pedicle screw placement can exceed 15%. Computed tomography (CT)- and fluoroscopy-based navigation systems may facilitate increased placement accuracy with reduced radiation exposure and operative times. METHODS.: Patients were alternately assigned to either the Guidance or Control group. The Guidance group underwent lumbar pedicle screw placement using the oblique visualization technique and computer-assisted fluoroscopic navigation. The Control group underwent lumbar pedicle screw placement per standard percutaneous technique aided by fluoroscopy alone. Baseline demographics, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, and American Spinal Injury Association scores were obtained preoperatively and in the immediate postoperative period. Fluoroscopy times and guidewire insertion times were recorded intraoperatively. All postoperative CT scans were reviewed by an independent spine surgeon to grade screw placement accuracy. RESULTS.: Forty-two patients (210 screws) were assigned to the Guidance group and 34 patients (152 screws) were assigned to the Control group. Use of Guidance resulted in reduced average fluoroscopy usage per pedicle [6.6 sec (SD = 5.1) vs. 9.6 sec (SD 6.2), P < 0.001] and more expedient placement of guidewires per pedicle [3.65 min (SD = 2.31) vs. 4.43 min (SD = 2.56), P = 0.003]. The Guidance group experienced less than half of the breach rate of the Control group (3.0% vs. 7.2%, P = 0.055) and reduced breach magnitudes. None of the breaches resulted in a corresponding neurological deficit or required revision. All patient-reported outcomes were significantly improved after surgery and there were no significant differences in average postoperative VAS scores between treatment groups. CONCLUSION.: Use of Guidance reduces fluoroscopy and insertion times with increased accuracy compared with conventional fluoroscopic methods of percutaneous pedicle screw insertion.
机译:研究设计:机构审查委员会批准的,前瞻性,多中心,比较研究。目的:评估与传统的荧光镜放置相比,计算机辅助荧光镜导航方法经皮穿刺放置椎弓根螺钉的准确性和实用性。背景数据摘要:最近的报告表明,经皮椎弓根螺钉置入过程中的皮质破坏可能超过15%。基于计算机断层扫描(CT)和荧光检查的导航系统可以在减少辐射暴露和缩短手术时间的情况下提高定位精度。方法:将患者交替分配至指导或对照组。指导小组使用倾斜的可视化技术和计算机辅助的荧光镜导航对腰椎椎弓根螺钉进行了置入。对照组根据标准的经皮技术仅通过透视检查就可进行腰椎椎弓根螺钉置入术。在术前和术后即刻获得基线人口统计学,视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分和美国脊髓损伤协会评分。术中记录透视时间和导丝插入时间。一名独立的脊柱外科医生对所有术后CT扫描均进行了检查,以评估螺钉放置的准确性。结果:42例患者(210颗螺钉)被分配到指导组,34例患者(152颗螺钉)被分配到对照组。使用指南导致每根椎弓根的平均透视检查使用量减少[6.6秒(SD = 5.1)与9.6秒(SD 6.2),P <0.001],并且每根椎弓根的导丝放置更加方便[3.65 min(SD = 2.31)vs. 4.43分钟(SD = 2.56),P = 0.003]。指导小组的违规率不到对照组的一半(3.0%比7.2%,P = 0.055),违规程度有所降低。没有违反导致相应的神经系统缺陷或需要修订。手术后所有患者报告的结局均得到显着改善,各治疗组之间的术后平均VAS评分无显着差异。结论:与传统的透视经皮椎弓根螺钉插入方法相比,使用指南减少了透视和插入时间,并提高了准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号