首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Predicting the outcome of selective thoracic fusion in false double major lumbar C
【24h】

Predicting the outcome of selective thoracic fusion in false double major lumbar C

机译:预测假双主腰C选择性胸廓融合术的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective radiographic and clinical study. OBJECTIVE: To examine the long-term outcome of selective thoracic fusion (STF) performed for lumbar "C" modifier curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The efficacy of STF in lumbar "C" false double major curves is controversial. We examined the 5- to 24-year outcomes of patients with "C" lumbar curves who underwent STF at a single institution to determine which factors help predict successful outcome. METHODS: Thirty-two patients (age, 14.8 +/- 2.0 years) with a lumbar "C" modifier underwent primary STF and had minimum 5-year follow-up (mean, 6.8 years). All patients were fused distally to either T12 or L1. At latest follow-up, 18 were considered successful (group S), 2 required reoperation to accommodate worsening deformity (group R), and 12 were considered marginal outcomes (group M), as defined by >3 cm coronal imbalance (n = 5), >5 mm worsening of lumbar apical vertebra translation compared with preoperative (n = 4), >1 Nash-Moe grade worsening of lumbar apical vertebra rotation (n = 1), >10 degrees thoracolumbar junction kyphosis which was at least 5 degrees worse than preoperative (n = 5), and lumbar Cobb angle >5 degrees worse than preoperative (n = 2). Clinical outcomes were determined by Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-30 at final follow-up. RESULTS: Of the multiple factors considered, 2-month postoperative standing lumbar sagittal alignment was most predictive for long-term outcome (P < 0.019 by Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA). Satisfactory outcomes had statistically significantly greater T12-S1 lordosis than those that were marginal (64.8 degrees (group S) vs. 52.0 degrees (group M); P = 0.014) or required reoperation (64.8 degrees [group S] vs. 38.0 degrees [group R]; P < 0.001). Traditionally considered variables such as apical vertebra rotation, apical vertebra translation, Cobb angle magnitudes, coronal and sagittal balance, and their respective thoracic-to-lumbar ratios were not independently significant. CONCLUSION: Selective thoracic fusions performed for lumbar "C" modifier scoliotic deformities generally have excellent long-term radiographic and SRS-30 outcomes at 5- to 24-year follow-up. Care should be taken to ensure that overcorrection of the thoracic curve is not performed beyond the ability of the lumbar curve to compensate. Furthermore, consideration of selective thoracic fusion should not be ruled out simply because the patient may have a somewhat stiff lumbar curve based on side-bending radiographs.
机译:研究设计:回顾性射线照相和临床研究。目的:探讨针对青少年特发性脊柱侧弯的腰椎“ C”调节曲线的选择性胸廓融合术(STF)的长期结果。背景资料的总结:STF在腰椎“ C”型假双主弯中的疗效是有争议的。我们检查了单机构接受STF的“ C”型腰弯患者的5至24年结局,以确定哪些因素有助于预测成功结局。方法:32例腰椎“ C”修饰剂患者(年龄14.8 +/- 2.0岁)接受了原发性STF,并且至少接受了5年的随访(平均6.8年)。所有患者均在远端融合至T12或L1。在最近的随访中,根据> 3 cm冠状动脉不平衡的定义(n = 5),18例被认为是成功的(S组),2例需要再次手术以适应恶化的畸形(R组),12例被认为是边缘性结局(M组)。 ),与术前相比,腰椎顶椎移位恶化> 5 mm(n = 4),> 1 Nash-Moe级腰椎顶椎旋转恶化(n = 1),> 10度胸腰交界后凸畸形,至少5度比术前恶化(n = 5),而腰Cobb角> 5度比术前恶化(n = 2)。在最后的随访中,脊柱侧弯研究学会(SRS)-30确定了临床结局。结果:在考虑的多种因素中,术后2个月站立的腰椎矢状位对长期预后最有预测作用(Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA的P <0.019)。在统计学上,令人满意的结果是T12-S1脊柱前凸明显高于边缘(64.8度(S组)vs. 52.0度(M组); P = 0.014)或需要再次手术(64.8度[S组] vs 38.0度[ R组; P <0.001)。传统上考虑的变量(例如,顶椎旋转,顶椎平移,Cobb角大小,冠状和矢状位平衡以及它们各自的胸腰比)并不是独立重要的。结论:针对腰椎“ C”型修饰性脊柱侧凸畸形进行的选择性胸廓融合术在5至24年的随访中通常具有良好的长期放射照相和SRS-30结果。应当注意确保不会超出腰曲线的补偿能力而无法对胸曲线进行过度矫正。此外,不应仅仅因为患者可能因侧弯X线片而具有较硬的腰弯而排除考虑进行选择性胸腔融合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号