首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Spontaneous lumbar curve correction in selective thoracic fusions of idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison of anterior and posterior approaches.
【24h】

Spontaneous lumbar curve correction in selective thoracic fusions of idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison of anterior and posterior approaches.

机译:特发性脊柱侧凸的选择性胸腔融合术中的自发性腰曲线矫正:前后入路的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective evaluation of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients treated with selective thoracic instrumentation and fusion. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the predictors and the effect of surgical approach (anterior versus posterior) on spontaneous lumbar curve correction (SLCC) after selective thoracic fusion in patients with structural thoracic and compensatory lumbar curves. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spontaneous coronal correction of the unfused lumbar curve has been described previously; however controversy continues regarding the effect of surgical approach on SLCC. METHODS: One hundred thirty-two anterior and 44 posterior selective thoracic fusions instrumented distally to T11, T12, or L1 were identified from a multicenter AIS database. A 2-way ANOVA was used to compare SLCC with regards to surgical approach and the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV). A Pearson's correlation analysis was utilized to identify radiographic variables associated with SLCC. A secondary analysis ofsurgical approach was then performed on 28 pairs of patients matching the factors that correlated positively with SLCC. RESULTS: The average SLCC for the anterior approach (44% +/- 19%) was less than that for the posterior approach (49% +/- 19%; P = 0.07), and was found to increase significantly with a more distal LIV (P 0.03). Pearson's correlation analysis revealed the strongest correlations between SLCC and preoperative lumbar curve flexibility (r = 0.20) and 2-year postoperative thoracic curve percent correction (r = 0.47). A secondary analysis of SLCC in paired curves matched by LIV, lumbar curve flexibility and thoracic percent correction revealed no difference between anterior (48%) and posterior (49%) approaches (P = 0.75). CONCLUSION: Anterior and posterior instrumented fusions performed selectively on the appropriate curves result in equal SLCC when matched by LIV, flexibility of the lumbar curve, and percent thoracic curve correction achieved. This suggests that the observed phenomenon of SLCC after selective thoracic fusion in AIS is independent of surgical approach and can be reliably achieved with either technique.
机译:研究设计:回顾性评估对青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)进行选择性胸腔器械融合治疗的患者。目的:评估结构性胸部和代偿性腰椎弯曲患者选择性胸椎融合术后自发性腰弯矫正(SLCC)的预测因素和效果。背景资料概述:先前已经描述了未融合腰椎弯的自发冠状矫正;然而,关于手术方法对SLCC的影响仍存在争议。方法:从多中心AIS数据库中识别出远端插在T11,T12或L1上的132例前胸和44例后胸选择性融合。使用2通方差分析(ANOVA)比较SLCC在手术方式和最低器械椎骨(LIV)方面的差异。皮尔逊相关分析被用来识别与SLCC相关的射线照相变量。然后对28对匹配与SLCC正相关的因素的患者进行了手术方法的二次分析。结果:前入路的平均SLCC(44%+/- 19%)小于后入路的平均SLCC(49%+/- 19%; P = 0.07),并且随着距离的增加,其平均SLCC显着增加LIV(P 0.03)。 Pearson的相关分析显示,SLCC与术前腰曲线柔韧性(r = 0.20)和术后2年胸廓曲线矫正百分比(r = 0.47)之间的相关性最强。对SLCC的成对曲线进行二次分析,结果显示LIV,腰曲线柔韧性和胸廓矫正率相匹配,显示前路(48%)和后路(49%)之间无差异(P = 0.75)。结论:在适当的曲线上选择性进行的前路和后路器械融合术在与LIV匹配时可获得相等的SLCC,腰椎弯曲的灵活性以及胸廓弯曲矫正的百分比得以实现。这表明在AIS中选择性胸腔融合后观察到的SLCC现象与手术方法无关,并且可以通过任何一种技术可靠地实现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号