首页> 外文期刊>South African journal of surgery. >Endoscopic management of bile leaks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy
【24h】

Endoscopic management of bile leaks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

机译:腹腔镜胆囊切除术后胆漏的内镜处理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background. A bile leak is an infrequent but potentially serious complication after biliary tract surgery. Endoscopic intervention is widely accepted as the treatment of choice. This study assessed the effectiveness of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), sphincterotomy and biliary stenting in the management of postoperative bile leaks. Methods. An ERCP database in a tertiary referral centre was reviewed retrospectively to identify all patients with bile leaks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patient records and endoscopy reports were reviewed. Results. One hundred and thirteen patients (92 women, 21 men; median age 47 years, range 22 - 82 years) with a bile leak were referred for initial endoscopic management at a median of 12 days (range 2 - 104 days) after surgery. Presenting features included intra-abdominal collections with pain in 58 cases (51.3%), abnormal liver function tests (LFTs) in 22 (19.5%), bile leak in 25 (22.1%), and sepsis in 8 (7.1%). Twenty-nine patients (25.7%) were found to have either major bile duct injuries without duct continuity, vascular injuries or other endoscopic findings requiring surgical or radiological intervention. Of 84 patients managed endoscopically, 44 had a cystic duct (CD) leak, 26 a CD leak and common bile duct (CBD) stones, and 14 a CBD injury amenable to endoscopic stenting. Of the 70 patients with CD leaks (group A), 24 underwent sphincterotomy only (including 8 stone extractions), 43 had a sphincterotomy with stent placement (including 18 stone extractions) and 1 had only a stent placed, while 2 patients with previous sphincterotomies required no further intervention. The average number of ERCPs in group A was 2.3 (range 1 - 7). Of the 14 patients with bile duct injuries treated endoscopically (group B), 7 had a class D, 5 an E5 and 2 a class B injury; 13 patients underwent sphincterotomy and stenting, and 1 had a sphincterotomy only. Group B required an average of 3.6 ERCPs (range 2 - 5). The 113 patients underwent a total of 269 ERCPs (mean 2.4, range 1 - 7). Seven patients had one or more complications related to the ERCP: 3 acute pancreatitis, 2 cholangitis, 2 sphincterotomy bleeds, 1 duodenal perforation and 1 impacted Dormia basket, the latter 2 requiring operative intervention. Conclusions. Three-quarters of bile leaks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy were due to CD leaks (with or without retained stones) or lesser bile duct injuries and were amenable to definitive endoscopic therapy. Nineteen patients (16.8%) had major injuries that required operative intervention.
机译:背景。胆漏是胆道手术后的一种罕见但潜在的严重并发症。内镜干预被广泛接受为治疗选择。这项研究评估了内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP),括约肌切开术和胆道内支架术在术后胆漏管理中的有效性。方法。回顾性地回顾了三级转诊中心的ERCP数据库,以识别所有腹腔镜胆囊切除术后胆漏的患者。回顾患者记录和内窥镜检查报告。结果。手术后中位数为12天(范围2-104天),建议将113例胆汁渗漏患者(92名女性,21名男性;中位年龄47岁,范围22-82岁)进行初始内镜处理。呈现的特征包括腹腔内疼痛收集58例(51.3%),肝功能检查异常(LFTs)22例(19.5%),胆漏25例(22.1%)和败血症8例(7.1%)。发现29名患者(25.7%)患有严重的胆管损伤而无导管连续性,血管损伤或其他需要手术或放射学干预的内镜检查结果。在84例经内镜治疗的患者中,有44例发生了胆囊管(CD)泄漏,26例发生了CD泄漏和胆总管(CBD)结石,14例因内镜支架置入而发生的CBD损伤。在70例CD泄漏患者中(A组),仅24例行括约肌切开术(包括8例结石摘除术),43例经括约肌切开术并置入支架(包括18例结石摘除术),1例仅作支架置入术,2例既有括约肌切开术无需进一步干预。 A组的ERCP的平均数量为2.3(范围1-7)。内镜下治疗的14例胆管损伤患者(B组)中,有7名D级,5名E5和2名B级损伤。 13例患者接受了括约肌切开术和支架置入术,其中1例仅接受了括约肌切开术。 B组平均需要3.6个ERCP(范围2-5)。 113例患者共接受了269例ERCP(平均2.4,范围1-7)。 7例患者有一种或多种与ERCP相关的并发症:3例急性胰腺炎,2例胆管炎,2例括约肌切开术出血,1例十二指肠穿孔和1例受累的Dormia提篮,后2例需要手术干预。结论腹腔镜胆囊切除术后胆汁渗漏的四分之三是由于CD渗漏(有或没有保留结石)或较少的胆管损伤所致,可以接受明确的内镜治疗。 19名患者(16.8%)重伤需要手术干预。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号