首页> 外文期刊>South African Journal of Botany >Wild flower harvesting on the Agulhas Plain, South Africa: Impact of harvesting intensity under a simulated commercial harvesting regime for two re-seeding and two re-sprouting fynbos species
【24h】

Wild flower harvesting on the Agulhas Plain, South Africa: Impact of harvesting intensity under a simulated commercial harvesting regime for two re-seeding and two re-sprouting fynbos species

机译:南非Agulhas平原上的野花收获:在模拟的商业收获制度下,两种再播种和两种萌芽的雌雄同株物种下收获强度的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We present a simple method for assessing the medium-term sustainability of different flower harvesting intensities (i.e. percentage of number of stems harvested per individual) for two re-seeders and re-sprouters of fynbos plants on the Agulhas Plain in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. We interpret our results from an ecological point of view, looking at impacts of harvesting on vegetative re-growth and survival of frequently harvested fynbos species, and an economic point of view, determining the cumulative number of stems harvested per year. We analysed the impact of different harvesting intensities on two obligate re-seeding (Erica corifolia (L.) and Erica imbricata (L.) and two strongly re-sprouting species (Brunie laevis (Thunb.) and Staavia radiata (L Dahl)) on different flower farms. Seventy-five randomly selected plants of each species were experimentally harvested in the same way as is done by flower harvesters. Fifteen plants of each species were left as controls (un-harvested) and 15 each were harvested (cut 15-20 cm below the inflorescence) such that 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of the inflorescences were removed. Harvested stems were labelled and the number of new shoots counted. Additionally we recorded plant height and mortality. 100% harvesting resulted in high mortality rates for both re-seeders (for both species 100% of the individuals were dead at the end of the experiment) and resprouters (for one species all 15 individuals were dead at the end of the experiment and for the other species 4 of 15). Re-seeders in particular were highly susceptible to harvesting below the first branching node, which generally also resulted in plant death. Both guilds can survive up to 75% harvesting (resprouters experienced no mortality for one species, while in the other 4 out of 15 died; of the re-seeders, 9 out of 15 died in the one species, while only 1 out of 15 in the other) and are still able to grow in height. For both seeders and resprouters we recommend that flower harvesters do not harvest in young veld. To ensure sufficient seed set and to avoid seed bank depletion we recommend to preferably only harvest between 25 and 50% of stems per individual
机译:我们提供了一种简单的方法,用于评估开普植物区(Cape Floristic Region)的Agulhas平原上Fynbos植物的两种再播种和再发芽的不同花卉采收强度的中期可持续性(即每人收获的茎的数量的百分比),南非。我们从生态学的角度解释我们的结果,着眼于收获对经常收获的雌雄同体植物无性繁殖和存活的影响,以及从经济的角度,确定每年收获的茎的累计数量。我们分析了不同收获强度对两个专性重播种(Erica corifolia(L.)和Erica imbricata(L.))和两个强重发芽物种(Brunie laevis(Thunb。)和Staavia radiata(L Dahl))的影响。在不同的花卉农场中,以与花卉收割机相同的方式,实验性地收获了每种物种的75种随机选择的植物,每种物种的15种植物作为对照(未收获),每种分别收获了15种(剪下15种)在花序以下-20厘米处)除去了25%,50%,75%和100%的花序;对收获的茎进行了标记并计算了新芽的数量。此外,我们记录了株高和死亡率。100%收获导致重新播种者(两种物种的100%的个体在实验结束时死亡)和生殖器(一种物种中的15个人在实验结束时均死亡)上的高死亡率15个中的4个。特别是在第一个分支结点以下极易发生收获,这通常也导致植物死亡。两种行会都可以在高达75%的收成下存活(繁殖者没有对一种物种致死,而在另外15种中有4种死亡;在重新播种的物种中,有15种中有9种死亡,而15种中只有1种死亡)在另一方),并且仍然能够增加身高。对于播种机和生殖器,我们建议不要将花型收割机收获到年轻的草地上。为确保足够的结实种子并避免种子库枯竭,我们建议每人最好只收获25%至50%的茎

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号