...
首页> 外文期刊>Soil Use and Management >Optical sensing and chemometric analysis of soil organic carbon - a cost effective alternative to conventional laboratory methods?
【24h】

Optical sensing and chemometric analysis of soil organic carbon - a cost effective alternative to conventional laboratory methods?

机译:土壤有机碳的光学传感和化学计量分析-传统实验室方法的经济有效替代方案?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Soil organic carbon (SOC) is frequently determined by the Walkley-Black (WB) method. A limitation of the test is incomplete oxidation of the carbon fraction and underestimation of SOC. Automated dry combustion methods are expensive and slow. Optical sensing and chemometric analysis offer the potential of an economical method capable of quantifying SOC fractions. The aim of this study was to identify the best SOC analysis method to facilitate maximum sampling resolution based on the cost per sample, analytical accuracy and time. A comparative evaluation was made of five techniques; (1) the WB method, (2) total combustion by total organic C analyser, (3) infrared (IR) diffuse reflectance spectroscopy, (4) a portable spectroradiometer and (5) laboratory hyperspectral imaging. This involved assessing equipment costs, consumables and time to derive total analytical cost. The benefits were sample throughput and analytical accuracy. Instrumentation represented the largest input to analytical cost and for optical methods was governed by the spectral range. In contrast to dry combustion, this cost is offset by high sample throughput and minimal consumable requirements for IR spectroscopy and hyperspectral imaging. Hyperspectral imaging is identified as the most rapid technique with potential to scan about 720 samples per day at 90% less cost than the WB method. The opportunity cost of hyperspectral imaging is to forfeit some analytical accuracy associated with the dry combustion method. Dry combustion, despite its high cost per sample, incurs no further costs associated with updating prediction models or developing site or soil specific correction factors.
机译:土壤有机碳(SOC)通常通过Walkley-Black(WB)方法确定。该测试的局限性在于碳部分的不完全氧化和SOC的低估。自动干式燃烧方法昂贵且缓慢。光学传感和化学计量分析提供了一种经济的方法,能够量化SOC分数。这项研究的目的是基于每份样品的成本,分析准确性和时间,确定有助于最大采样分辨率的最佳SOC分析方法。对五种技术进行了比较评估。 (1)WB方法;(2)通过总有机碳分析仪进行总燃烧;(3)红外(IR)漫反射光谱;(4)便携式光谱辐射仪;(5)实验室高光谱成像。这涉及评估设备成本,消耗品和时间以得出总分析成本。好处是样品通量和分析准确性。仪器是分析成本的最大投入,而光学方法则受光谱范围的支配。与干式燃烧相比,此成本被高样品通量和红外光谱和高光谱成像的最低消耗要求所抵消。高光谱成像被认为是最快速的技术,具有每天扫描约720个样本的潜力,其成本比WB方法低90%。高光谱成像的机会成本是丧失了与干式燃烧方法相关的某些分析精度。干式燃烧尽管每个样本的成本很高,但不会产生与更新预测模型或开发地点或土壤特定校正因子相关的其他成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号