首页> 外文期刊>Society and Natural Resources >Market-based instruments for ecosystem services: institutional innovation or renovation? (Special Issue: The institutional dimension of 'market-based instruments' for governing ecosystem services.)
【24h】

Market-based instruments for ecosystem services: institutional innovation or renovation? (Special Issue: The institutional dimension of 'market-based instruments' for governing ecosystem services.)

机译:基于市场的生态系统服务手段:体制创新还是革新? (特刊:用于管理生态系统服务的“基于市场的工具”的机构方面。)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Recent years have seen widespread experimentation with market-based instruments (MBIs) for the provision of environmental goods and ecosystem services. However, little attention has been paid to their design or to the effects of the underlying pro-market narrative on environmental policy instruments. The purpose of this article is to analyze the emergence and dissemination of the term "market-based instruments" applied to the provision of environmental services and to assess to what extent the instruments associated are genuinely innovative. The recommendation to develop markets can lead in practice to a variety of institutional forms, as we show it based on the example of payments for environmental services (PES) and biodiversity offsets, two very different mechanisms that are both presented in the literature as MBIs. Our purpose is to highlight the gap between discourse and practice in connection with MBIs.
机译:近年来,为提供环境商品和生态系统服务,已经对基于市场的工具(MBI)进行了广泛的试验。但是,人们对其设计或潜在的亲市场叙述对环境政策工具的影响的关注很少。本文的目的是分析适用于提供环境服务的“基于市场的工具”一词的出现和传播,并评估与之相关的工具在多大程度上是真正的创新。关于开发市场的建议实际上可以导致多种制度形式,正如我们基于环境服务付款(PES)和生物多样性补偿的例子所展示的那样,这两种非常不同的机制在文献中都被称为MBI。我们的目的是强调与MBI相关的话语和实践之间的差距。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号