首页> 外文期刊>Soil Biology & Biochemistry >Soil carbon characterization and nutrient ratios across land uses on two contrasting soils: Their relationships to microbial biomass and function
【24h】

Soil carbon characterization and nutrient ratios across land uses on two contrasting soils: Their relationships to microbial biomass and function

机译:两种截然不同的土壤在不同土地利用方式下的土壤碳特征和养分比:它们与微生物生物量和功能的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Soil carbon (C) plays a central role in the global biogeochemical cycles of most major nutrients, but the degree to which the quality versus quantity of C controls microbial abundance and function across land uses is still somewhat uncertain. We measured soil organic matter (SOM) concentration and composition as well as nutrient ratios and other soil characteristics on two contrasting soil types across three land uses (forest, pasture, maize cropping), to determine their relationships to microbial abundance and specific measures of microbial activity (e.g. qCO(2), the ratio of respiration rate to microbial biomass, and net laboratory N mineralization). Although there was significant variability in bulk SOM composition (by C-13 NMR spectroscopy), we could detect differences between broad-leaved forest and pasture/maize systems on a landscape scale, primarily attributable to differences in aryl C content. Variability in O-alkyl C between sites correlated strongly with the soil C:N ratio, but variability in alkyl C (which was particularly evident in pasture sites) could not be adequately explained by measured environmental or soil characteristics. Soil C:P and N:P ratios followed similar patterns with forest > pasture > maize. Bulk soil C:N, hot-water extractable C:N and particulate C:N all followed similar patterns with forest > pasture approximate to maize cropping. Microbial biomass C:N followed a different pattern, however, with forest approximate to pasture > maize. Despite the differences in SOM composition and nutrient ratios, anaerobically mineralizable N and hot-water extractable C (as a measures of available C) best explained the variation in microbial biomass and function across sites. Anaerobically mineralizable N generally explained the most variation for microbial biomass and qCO2 and had the smallest soil or land use effect. Hot-water extractable C explained the most variance for net N mineralization. Addition of stoichiometric measures and other soil attributes (e.g. soil C:N, C:P, delta N-15) in a multiple regression model explained more of the variation than a single factor plus the land use effect (though soil order still explained a small, but significant amount of variance for measures of microbial biomass). A measure of available C, however, was needed to explain the maximum amount of variance in microbial biomass and function across sites (i.e. total C plus nutrient status and other soil attributes could not explain as much of the variance). Our data suggest that nutrient content/stoichiometry does assist in defining the quality of SOM, but a measure of available C (similar to the "active" pool in C models) is also needed. Anaerobically mineralizable N and/or hot water-water extractable C appear to be adequate measures of available C that relate to "active" C, but C functional groups (from C-13 NMR spectroscopy) were not particularly useful for this purpose. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在大多数主要养分的全球生物地球化学循环中,土壤碳(C)发挥着核心作用,但是在不同土地利用条件下,碳的质量与数量控制微生物丰度和功能的程度仍不确定。我们在三种土地利用(森林,牧场,玉米种植)的两种不同土壤类型上测量了土壤有机质(SOM)的浓度和组成以及养分比和其他土壤特征,以确定它们与微生物丰度的关系以及微生物的具体措施活性(例如,qCO(2),呼吸速率与微生物生物量的比率以及实验室净氮矿化)。尽管大体SOM组成存在显着差异(通过C-13 NMR光谱分析),但我们可以在景观尺度上检测阔叶林和牧场/玉米系统之间的差异,这主要归因于芳基C含量的差异。站点之间O-烷基C的变异性与土壤C:N比密切相关,但是烷基C的变异性(在牧场中尤为明显)无法通过测量的环境或土壤特征充分解释。土壤C:P和N:P比率遵循相似的模式,即森林>牧场>玉米。大块土壤C:N,可热水提取的C:N和颗粒C:N都遵循相似的模式,其中森林>牧场近似于玉米种植。然而,微生物生物量C:N遵循不同的模式,而森林近似于牧场>玉米。尽管SOM的组成和养分比存在差异,但厌氧可矿化的N和热水中的C(作为可利用的C的量度)最好地解释了整个地点微生物生物量和功能的变化。厌氧可矿化的氮通常解释了微生物生物量和qCO2的变化最大,对土壤或土地的使用影响最小。可热水萃取的C解释了净N矿化的最大差异。在多元回归模型中添加化学计量指标和其他土壤属性(例如,土壤C:N,C:P,δN-15)比单因素加土地利用效应更能解释变化(尽管土壤顺序仍然可以解释微生物生物量的测量值差异很小,但差异很大。)但是,需要测量可用的C来解释跨站点的微生物生物量和功能的最大变化量(即总C加上养分状况和其他土壤属性无法解释这么多的变化)。我们的数据表明,营养物含量/化学计量确实有助于定义SOM的质量,但是还需要一种有效C的测量方法(类似于C模型中的“活性”库)。厌氧可矿化的N和/或热水-水可萃取的C似乎是与“活性” C相关的可用C的适当量度,但C官能团(来自C-13 NMR光谱法)并非为此特别有用。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号