首页> 外文期刊>Soil Biology & Biochemistry >Identifying the characteristics of organic soil amendments that suppress soilborne plant diseases
【24h】

Identifying the characteristics of organic soil amendments that suppress soilborne plant diseases

机译:确定抑制土壤传播的植物病害的有机土壤改良剂的特征

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Application of organic amendments has been proposed as a strategy for the management of diseases caused by soilborne pathogens. However, inconsistent results seriously hinder their practical use. In this work we use an extensive data set of 2423 studies derived from 252 papers to explore this strategy. First, we assess the capability of a specific organic amendment to control different diseases; second, we investigate the influence of organic matter (OM) decomposition on disease suppressiveness; and third, we search for physical, chemical and biological parameters able to identify suppressive OM. OM was found to be consistently suppressive to different pathogens in only a few studies where a limited number of pathogens were tested. In the majority of studies a material suppressive to a pathogen was ineffective or even conducive to other pathogens, suggesting that OM suppressiveness is often pathogen-specific. OM decomposition in many studies (73%, n = 426) emerged as a crucial process affecting suppressiveness. During decomposition, disease suppression either increased, decreased, was unchanged or showed more complex responses, such as 'hump-shaped' dynamics. Peat suppressiveness generally decreased during decomposition, while responses of composts and crop residues were more complex. However, due to the many interactions of contributing factors (OM quality, microbial community composition, pathosystem tested and decomposition time), it was difficult to identify specific predictors of disease suppression. Among the 81 parameters analysed, only some of the 643 correlations showed a consistent relationship with disease suppression. The response of pathogen populations to OM amendments was a reliable feature only for some organic matter types (e.g. crop residues and organic wastes with C-to-N ratio lower than [not, vert, similar]15) and for pathogens with a limited saprophytic ability (e.g., Thielaviopsis basicola and Verticillium dahliae). Instead, population responses of the pathogenic fungi Phytophthora spp., Rhizoctonia solani and Pythium spp. appeared unrelated to disease suppression. Overall, enzymatic and microbiological parameters, rather than chemical ones, were much more informative for predicting suppressiveness. The most useful features were FDA activity, substrate respiration, microbial biomass, total culturable bacteria, fluorescent pseudomonads and Trichoderma populations. We conclude that the integration of different parameters (e.g. FDA hydrolysis and chemical composition by super(13)C NMR) may be a promising approach for identification of suppressive amendments.
机译:已提出应用有机改良剂作为管理由土壤传播的病原体引起的疾病的策略。但是,不一致的结果严重阻碍了它们的实际使用。在这项工作中,我们使用来自252篇论文的2423项研究的广泛数据集来探索这种策略。首先,我们评估了特定有机改良剂控制不同疾病的能力;其次,我们研究了有机物(OM)分解对疾病抑制的影响;第三,我们搜索能够识别抑制性OM的物理,化学和生物学参数。仅在少数对病原体进行了检测的研究中,发现OM对各种病原体具有持续抑制作用。在大多数研究中,抑制病原体的物质无效或什至不利于其他病原体,这表明OM抑制性通常是病原体特异性的。在许多研究中,OM分解(73%,n = 426)是影响抑制性的关键过程。在分解过程中,疾病抑制作用增加,减少,保持不变或显示出更复杂的响应,例如“驼峰形”动力学。在分解过程中,泥炭抑制作用通常会降低,而堆肥和农作物残留物的响应则更为复杂。但是,由于影响因素的许多相互作用(OM质量,微生物群落组成,测试的病理系统和分解时间),很难确定疾病抑制的具体预测因子。在分析的81个参数中,只有643个相关性中的一些显示出与疾病抑制的一致关系。仅对于某些有机物质类型(例如,作物残渣和C / N比低于[not,vert,类似] 15的有机废物)和腐生性有限的病原体,病原体种群对OM修正的响应才是可靠的特征。能力(例如,Thielaviopsis basicola和黄萎病)。取而代之的是致病性真菌疫霉属,茄根枯菌和腐霉属的种群响应。似乎与疾病抑制无关。总体而言,酶和微生物参数,而不是化学参数,对于预测抑制性更具参考价值。最有用的功能是FDA活性,底物呼吸作用,微生物生物量,可培养细菌总数,荧光假单胞菌和木霉菌种群。我们得出的结论是,整合不同参数(例如FDA水解和通过super(13)C NMR进行的化学成分分析)可能是鉴定抑制性修饰的有前途的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号