【24h】

OVER TO THE FLOOR

机译:在地板上

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the first of the Question Time discussions on day two, Jack Ferguson of Skinnovation fielded queries about claims and what has to be considered to comply. The first question was a long and multi-level one: The US does not permit claims that refer to collagen and elastin because they are considered structural claims and therefore drugs; whereas in the EU claims such as 'boosts collagen' and 'promotes elastin' are widely used. Can these be substantiated under the Common Criteria for Claims, and would the Advertising Standards Authority in the UK accept that data can be provided to support their use on cosmetic products? And how much can ingredient information be used to support product attributes?
机译:在第二天的“提问时间”讨论的第一场中,Skinnovation的Jack Ferguson提出了有关索赔以及必须考虑的事项的询问。第一个问题是一个漫长而多层次的问题:美国不允许涉及胶原蛋白和弹性蛋白的声明,因为它们被认为是结构性声明,因此被认为是药物;而在欧盟,“增强胶原蛋白”和“促进弹性蛋白”等声称已被广泛使用。是否可以根据《通用索赔标准》证实这些证据,英国的广告标准局会接受可以提供数据来支持其在化妆品中的使用吗?多少成分信息可用于支持产品属性?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号