首页> 外文期刊>Soil & Tillage Research >Strategic tillage in no-till farming systems in Australia's northern grains-growing regions: II. Implications for agronomy, soil and environment
【24h】

Strategic tillage in no-till farming systems in Australia's northern grains-growing regions: II. Implications for agronomy, soil and environment

机译:澳大利亚北部谷物产区的免耕耕作系统中的战略性耕作:II。对农学,土壤和环境的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In semi-arid sub-tropical areas, a number of studies concerning no-till (NT) farming systems have demonstrated advantages in economic, environmental and soil quality aspects over conventional tillage (CT). However, adoption of continuous NT has contributed to the build-up of herbicide resistant weed populations, increased incidence of soil- and stubble-borne diseases, and stratification of nutrients and organic carbon near the soil surface. Some farmers often resort to an occasional strategic tillage (ST) to manage these problems of NT systems. However, farmers who practice strict NT systems are concerned that even one-time tillage may undo positive soil condition benefits of NT farming systems. We reviewed the pros and cons of the use of occasional ST in NT farming systems. Impacts of occasional ST on agronomy, soil and environment are site-specific and depend on many interacting soil, climatic and management conditions. Most studies conducted in North America and Europe suggest that introducing occasional ST in continuous NT farming systems could improve productivity and profitability in the short term; however in the long-term, the impact is negligible or may be negative. The short term impacts immediately following occasional ST on soil and environment include reduced protective cover, soil loss by erosion, increased runoff, loss of C and water, and reduced microbial activity with little or no detrimental impact in the long-term. A potential negative effect immediately following ST would be reduced plant available water which may result in unreliability of crop sowing in variable seasons. The occurrence of rainfall between the ST and sowing or immediately after the sowing is necessary to replenish soil water lost from the seed zone. Timing of ST is likely to be critical and must be balanced with optimising soil water prior to seeding. The impact of occasional ST varies with the tillage implement used; for example, inversion tillage using mouldboard tillage results in greater impacts as compared to chisel or disc. Opportunities for future research on occasional ST with the most commonly used implements such as tine and/or disc in Australia's northern grains-growing region are presented in the context of agronomy, soil and the environment. Crown Copyright (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:在半干旱的亚热带地区,许多有关免耕(NT)耕作制度的研究表明,与常规耕作(CT)相比,其在经济,环境和土壤质量方面具有优势。但是,采用连续性NT有助于形成抗除草剂杂草种群,增加土壤和残茬传播疾病的发病率,并使土壤表面的养分和有机碳分层。一些农民通常会偶尔进行战略耕作(ST)来管理NT系统的这些问题。但是,实行严格的NT系统的农民担心即使一次性耕种也可能无法消除NT耕作制度对土壤状况的积极影响。我们回顾了在NT农业系统中偶尔使用ST的利弊。偶尔的ST对农艺,土壤和环境的影响是针对特定地点的,并且取决于许多相互作用的土壤,气候和管理条件。在北美和欧洲进行的大多数研究表明,在连续的NT耕作系统中偶尔引入ST可以在短期内提高生产力和盈利能力。但是,从长远来看,影响可以忽略不计,或者可能是负面的。偶尔发生ST后立即对土壤和环境造成的短期影响包括保护层减少,土壤因侵蚀而流失,径流增加,C和水的流失以及微生物活性降低,而长期的影响很小甚至没有。 ST后立即产生的潜在负面影响将是植物可用水减少,这可能导致不同季节的农作物播种不可靠。为了补充从种子区流失的土壤水分,有必要在ST和播种之间或播种后立即发生降雨。 ST的时间可能很关键,必须在播种前与优化土壤水分相平衡。偶尔的ST的影响因所使用的耕作机具而异;例如,与凿子或圆盘相比,使用翻板耕作的反向耕作会产生更大的影响。在农学,土壤和环境的背景下,提出了对偶尔的ST进行研究的机会,该研究将在澳大利亚北部谷物种植区使用最常用的工具(例如尖齿和/或圆盘)进行。官方版权(C)2014,Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号