...
首页> 外文期刊>Soil & Tillage Research >Comparison between artificial neural network and partial least squares for on-line visible and near infrared spectroscopy measurement of soil organic carbon, pH and clay content
【24h】

Comparison between artificial neural network and partial least squares for on-line visible and near infrared spectroscopy measurement of soil organic carbon, pH and clay content

机译:人工神经网络和偏最小二乘在线可见和近红外光谱法测量土壤有机碳,pH和黏土含量的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Soil organic carbon (OC), pH and clay content (CC) can be measured with on-line visible and near infrared spectroscopy (vis-NIRS), whose calibration method may considerably affect the measurement accuracy. The aim of this study was to compare artificial neural network (ANN) and partial least squares regression (PLSR) for the calibration of a visible and near infrared (vis-NIR) spectrophotometer for the on-line measurement of OC, pH and CC in two fields in a Danish farm. An on-line sensor platform equipped with a mobile, fiber type, vis-NIR spectrophotometer (AgroSpec from tec5 Technology for Spectroscopy, Germany), with a measurement range of 305-2200 nm was used to acquire soil spectra in diffuse reflectance mode. Both ANN and PLSR calibration models of OC, pH and CC were validated with independent validation sets. Comparison and full-point maps were developed using ArcGIS software (ESRI, USA). Results of the on-line independent validation showed that ANN outperformed PLSR in both fields. For example, residual prediction deviation (RPD) values for on-line independent validation in Field 1 were improved from 1.93 to 2.28, for OC, from 2.08 to 2.31 for pH and from 1.98 to 2.15 for CC, after ANN analyses as compared to PLSR, whereas root mean square error (RMSEP) values decreased from 1.48 to 1.25%, for OC, from 0.13 to 0.12 for pH and from 1.05 to 0.96% for CC. The comparison maps showed better spatial similarities between laboratory and ANN predicted maps (higher kappa values), as compared to PLSR predicted maps. In most cases, more detailed full-point maps were developed with ANN, although the size of spots with high concentration of PLSR maps matches the measured maps better. Therefore, it was recommended to adopt the ANN for on-line prediction of DC, pH and CC. Crown Copyright (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:土壤中的有机碳(OC),pH和粘土含量(CC)可以通过在线可见和近红外光谱(vis-NIRS)进行测量,其校准方法可能会极大地影响测量精度。这项研究的目的是比较人工神经网络(ANN)和偏最小二乘回归(PLSR)校准可见光和近红外(vis-NIR)分光光度计以在线测量OC中的OC,pH和CC丹麦农场的两个田地。使用配备了移动式光纤型vis-NIR分光光度计(来自tec5 Technology for Spectroscopy,德国的AgroSpec),测量范围为305-2200 nm的在线传感器平台,以漫反射模式获取土壤光谱。使用独立的验证集对OC,pH和CC的ANN和PLSR校准模型进行了验证。比较和全点地图是使用ArcGIS软件(美国ESRI)开发的。在线独立验证的结果表明,在两个领域中,人工神经网络均优于PLSR。例如,与PLSR相比,经过ANN分析后,字段1的在线独立验证的残差预测偏差(RPD)值从OC的1.93降低到2.28,pH的从2.08降低到2.31,CC的从1.98降低到2.15。 ,而OC的均方根误差(RMSEP)值从1.48降低到1.25%,pH值从0.13降低到0.12,CC值从1.05降低到0.96%。与PLSR预测图相比,比较图显示了实验室和ANN预测图之间更好的空间相似性(较高的kappa值)。在大多数情况下,尽管具有高浓度PLSR图的斑点的大小与测得的图更好地匹配,但是使用ANN可以开发出更详细的全点图。因此,建议采用ANN在线预测DC,pH和CC。官方版权(C)2014,Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号