首页> 外文期刊>Soil & Tillage Research >Comparison of risk assessment methods to determine the subsoil compaction risk of agricultural soils in The Netherlands.
【24h】

Comparison of risk assessment methods to determine the subsoil compaction risk of agricultural soils in The Netherlands.

机译:比较风险评估方法以确定荷兰农业土壤的地下土壤压实风险。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Subsoil compaction is a recognised threat in the European Soil Strategy and knowledge concerning the vulnerability of subsoils to compaction in Europe and the Netherlands is information required for the determination of priority areas (or risk areas) in the future European Soil Framework Directive. In Europe two risk assessment methods (RAM) are used in more than one country to determine the subsoil compaction risk. The first one (RAM-A) initially determines the susceptibility of soils to compaction as a function of texture and packing density. In the second step the vulnerability to compaction is determined as a function of susceptibility and climate. The second RAM (RAM-B) is a mechanistic model in which the soil mechanical strength determines whether a subsoil is susceptible to compaction. The RAMs are used to produce maps presenting the susceptibility and vulnerability to compaction of Dutch subsoils (RAM-A) and maps with the compression strength and maximal allowable wheel load of a Terra Tire to prevent compaction of Dutch subsoils (RAM-B). Both RAMs have weaknesses. RAM-A is an expert model and can be rather arbitrarily with results that are not in agreement with our experience. RAM-B suffers from lack of good data and probably underestimates subsoil strengths. Results of both RAMs are compared to each other and to a map showing the probability that the subsoil is already overcompacted. This probability map is based on bulk density data in the Dutch Soil Database (BIS). There is a good match between the results of both RAMs, however, the match with the probability map (presumed to be "reality") is not good. In both RAMs sand and loamy sand soils are indicated as more vulnerable than clay soils, while in the probability map sand subsoils suffer less of subsoil compaction than clay soils. Of concern is that, according to the probability map, about 50% of the most productive and fertile soils of The Netherlands have overcompacted subsoils.
机译:在欧洲土壤战略中,地下土壤压实是公认的威胁,有关欧洲和荷兰地下土壤易压实的知识是确定未来欧洲土壤框架指令中优先领域(或风险领域)所需的信息。在欧洲,一个以上的国家使用了两种风险评估方法(RAM)来确定地下土压实风险。第一个(RAM-A)最初确定土壤对压实的敏感性,取决于质地和堆积密度。在第二步中,根据压敏性和气候确定压实的脆弱性。第二RAM(RAM-B)是一种机械模型,其中土壤机械强度决定了地下土壤是否易于压实。 RAM用于生成表示荷兰地基压实(RAM-A)的敏感性和脆弱性的地图,以及具有Terra轮胎的压缩强度和最大允许车轮载荷以防止荷兰地基压实(RAM-B)的地图。两个RAM都有弱点。 RAM-A是专家模型,并且可以随意得出与我们的经验不一致的结果。 RAM-B缺乏良好的数据,并且可能低估了土壤的强度。将两个RAM的结果相互比较,并与显示地下土壤已经过压实的概率的地图进行比较。该概率图基于荷兰土壤数据库(BIS)中的容重数据。两个RAM的结果之间有很好的匹配,但是,与概率图的匹配(假定为“现实”)不好。在随机存取存储器中,砂土和壤质砂土都比黏土更脆弱,而在概率图中,砂土的底土压实比黏土要小。值得关注的是,根据概率图,荷兰约50%的生产力最高和最肥沃的土壤中土壤过密。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号