...
首页> 外文期刊>Skeletal radiology >Introduction of an alternative standardized radiographic measurement method to evaluate volar angulation in subcapital fractures of the 5th metacarpal
【24h】

Introduction of an alternative standardized radiographic measurement method to evaluate volar angulation in subcapital fractures of the 5th metacarpal

机译:引入另一种标准化的放射线测量方法来评估掌骨下掌第五骨折的掌侧角度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective The purpose of the present study was to compare the intra- and interobserver reliability of two different measurement methods for volar angulation of the 5th metacarpal (MC) in an attempt to establish a new standard measurement method to reduce interobserver discrepancies for therapeutic decisions. Materials and methods Twenty patients with subcapital fractures of the 5th MC were radiologically investigated. Imaging consisted of a radiographs in antero-posterior and precise lateral view in addition to a CT scan of the 5th MC. Measurement of volar angulation was accomplished using the conventional and the shaft articular surface (SAS) method. The measurements of five investigators were exported to a spreadsheet for statistical analysis to evaluate the intra-and interobserver reliability. Results The conventional technique showed large differences among the investigators and poor interobserver reliability (W=0.328 and 0.307) both at injury (p=0.001) and at follow-up (p=0.189). The intraobserver concordance of all investigators showed better results with the SAS than with the conventional technique. With the SAS technique, no statistically significant difference among the investigators could be detected at either the time of injury (p=0.418) or at follow-up (p=0.526) with excellent interobserver reliability (W=0.051 and W00.041). Evaluation of volar angulation at follow-up using CT scans did not show any statistically significant difference between the techniques with better correlation among the observers with the SAS technique (p=0.838). Conclusions The interobserver correlation of volar angulation with lateral radiographs using the conventional technique was insufficient. Therefore, we recommend the use of the novel SAS technique as standardized measurement method which showed higher accuracy and interobserver reliability in order to facilitate the choice of adequate treatment option.
机译:目的本研究的目的是比较两种不同的测量方法对掌骨掌侧角的两种不同测量方法的信度,以期建立新的标准测量方法以减少观察者之间的差异以做出治疗决策。资料与方法对20例5MC的首都圈下骨折患者进行放射学检查。影像包括第5 MC的CT扫描以及前后侧的X光片和精确的侧视图。掌侧角的测量是使用常规和轴关节表面(SAS)方法完成的。将五名调查员的测量结果导出到电子表格以进行统计分析,以评估观察者内部和观察者之间的可靠性。结果常规技术在损伤(p = 0.001)和随访(p = 0.189)时,研究者之间差异很大,观察者间的信度差(W = 0.328和0.307)。与传统技术相比,所有研究人员的观察者内一致性显示出更好的效果。使用SAS技术,在受伤时(p = 0.418)或随访时(p = 0.526),观察者之间的信度(W = 0.051和W00.041)极佳,在统计学上差异无统计学意义。使用CT扫描在随访中评估掌侧角度时,两种技术之间没有统计学上的显着差异,并且观察者与SAS技术之间具有更好的相关性(p = 0.838)。结论采用常规技术,掌侧角与侧位X线片的观察者间相关性不足。因此,我们建议使用新颖的SAS技术作为标准化的测量方法,该方法应具有较高的准确性和观察者之间的可靠性,以便于选择适当的治疗方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号