首页> 外文期刊>Social science and medicine >Occupational stressors and hypertension: a multi-method study using observer-based job analysis and self-reports in urban transit operators.
【24h】

Occupational stressors and hypertension: a multi-method study using observer-based job analysis and self-reports in urban transit operators.

机译:职业压力源和高血压:使用基于观察者的工作分析和城市公交运营商的自我报告的多方法研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This multi-method study aimed to disentangle objective and subjective components of job stressors and determine the role of each for hypertension risk. Because research on job stressors and hypertension has been exclusively based on self-reports of stressors, the tendency of some individuals to use denial and repressive coping might be responsible for the inconclusive results in previous studies. Stressor measures with different degrees of objectivity were contrasted, including (1) an observer-based measure of stressors (job barriers, time pressure) obtained from experts, (2) self-reported frequency and appraised intensity of job problems and time pressures averaged per workplace (group level), (3) self-reported frequency of job problems and time pressures at the individual level, and (4) self-reported appraised intensity of job problems and time pressures at the individual level. The sample consisted of 274 transit operators working on 27 different transit lines and four different vehicle types. Objective stressors (job barriers and time pressure) were each significantly associated with hypertension (casual blood pressure readings and/or currently taking anti-hypertensive medication) after adjustment for age, gender and seniority. Self-reported stressors at the individual level were positively but not significantly associated with hypertension. At the group level, only appraisal of job problems significantly predicted hypertension. In a composite regression model, both observer-based job barriers and self-reported intensity of job problems were independently and significantly associated with hypertension. Associations between self-reported job problems (individual level) and hypertension were dependent on the level of objective stressors. When observer-based stressor level was low, the association between self-reported frequency of stressors and hypertension was high. When the observer-based stressor level was high the association was inverse; this might be indicative of denial of stress or alexithymia. We feel that multi-method studies are useful for disentangling the relations between objective and subjective stress and hypertension.
机译:这项多方法研究旨在弄清工作压力源的客观和主观因素,并确定每种因素在高血压风险中的作用。由于对工作压力源和高血压的研究完全基于压力源的自我报告,因此某些人倾向于使用否定性和压抑性应对可能是先前研究不确定的原因。对比了具有不同客观程度的压力源测度,包括(1)从专家那里获得的基于观察者的压力源测度(工作障碍,时间压力),(2)自我报告的频率以及工作问题的评估强度和平均时间压力。工作场所(小组级别),(3)个人水平的自我报告的工作问题和时间压力的频率,以及(4)个人水平的自我报告的评估工作问题和时间压力的强度。该样本由274名公交运营商组成,他们分别在27条不同的公交线路和4种不同的车辆类型上工作。调整年龄,性别和资历后,客观压力源(工作障碍和时间压力)均与高血压(休闲血压读数和/或目前正在服用抗高血压药物)显着相关。在个体水平上自我报告的压力源与高血压呈正相关,但无显着相关性。在小组一级,只有对工作问题的评估才能显着预测高血压。在复合回归模型中,基于观察者的工作障碍和自我报告的工作问题强度均独立且与高血压显着相关。自我报告的工作问题(个人)与高血压之间的关联取决于客观压力源的水平。当基于观察者的应激源水平较低时,自我报告的应激源频率与高血压之间的相关性较高。当基于观察者的压力源水平很高时,关联是相反的;这可能表明压力或读写障碍被拒绝。我们认为多方法研究对于理清主观压力与高血压之间的关系很有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号