...
首页> 外文期刊>Social science and medicine >Accessibility and spatial distribution of general practice services in an Australian city by levels of social disadvantage.
【24h】

Accessibility and spatial distribution of general practice services in an Australian city by levels of social disadvantage.

机译:按社会弱势群体的水平,在澳大利亚城市中,全科医生服务的可访问性和空间分布。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The accessibility and spatial distribution of health services provided by the main source of primary medical care in Australia--the general practice surgery--was investigated by level of social disadvantage of local catchment areas. All 459 general practice surgeries in Perth, an Australian city of 1.2 million residents, were surveyed with a 94% response. Amount of service provision was measured using weekly doctor-hours, available from consulting rooms during opening hours, and associated nurse-hours of service. Access factors were defined as the distance to the nearest surgery, provision of Sunday and evening services, ease of making a same day appointment, bulk-billing, and whether the surgery offered a choice of gender of doctor. There were relatively more surgeries in disadvantaged areas and doctor-hours of service provision were also greater (41.0 h/1,000 most disadvantaged vs. 37.9 h/1000 least disadvantaged). Bulk-billing care, at no direct cost to the patient, was more likely to be provided in most disadvantaged areas compared with least disadvantaged areas (61 vs. 38%). However, populations living in the most disadvantaged areas were less likely to be able to see the local GP at short notice (91 vs. 95%), to have access to a local female GP (56 vs. 62%) or a local service in the evenings (42 vs. 51%). While the overall picture of accessibility was favourable, there was considerable variation in the type of services provided to different socioeconomic groups. Health care planners should investigate the reasons for these differences and advise Government to ensure that access factors affecting publicly funded services are equitably distributed.
机译:根据当地集水区的社会弱势水平,调查了澳大利亚主要医疗服务的主要来源(全科医生)提供的卫生服务的可及性和空间分布。在澳大利亚有120万人口的珀斯市,所有459例普通外科手术均得到了94%的调查。服务的提供量是使用每周的医生小时数(在开放时间可从诊室获得)以及相关的护士小时数来衡量的。访问因素定义为距最近的手术的距离,提供周日和晚上的服务,便于预约当天,批量计费以及手术是否提供了医生性别的选择。处境不利地区的手术相对较多,医生提供的服务时间也更长(处境最不利者为41.0 h / 1,000,处境最不利者为37.9 h / 1000)。与最弱势地区相比,在最弱势地区更可能提供不给患者直接费用的批量计费护理(61%vs. 38%)。但是,生活在最不利地区的人口不太可能在短时间内见到当地全科医生(91比95%),获得当地女性全科医生(56比62%)或当地服务的机会。在晚上(42%对51%)。尽管无障碍获取的总体情况是有利的,但向不同社会经济群体提供的服务类型却有很大差异。卫生保健规划人员应调查造成这些差异的原因,并建议政府确保公平分配影响公共资助服务的获取因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号