...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >Access all areas? An area-level analysis of accessibility to general practice and community pharmacy services in England by urbanity and social deprivation
【24h】

Access all areas? An area-level analysis of accessibility to general practice and community pharmacy services in England by urbanity and social deprivation

机译:进入所有区域?对城市化和社会贫困对英格兰全科医学和社区药房服务无障碍性的区域分析

获取原文

摘要

Objectives (1) To determine the percentage of the population in England that has access to a general practitioner (GP) premises within a 20?min walk (the accessibility); (2) explore the relationship between the walking distance to a GP premises and urbanity and social deprivation and (3) compare accessibility of a GP premises to that of a community pharmacy—and how this may vary by urbanity and social deprivation. Design This area-level analysis spatial study used postcodes for all GP premises and community pharmacies in England. Each postcode was assigned to a population lookup table and Lower Super Output Area (LSOA). The LSOA was then matched to urbanity (urban, town and fringe, or village, hamlet and isolated dwellings) and deprivation decile (using the Index of Multiple Deprivation score 2010). Primary outcome measure Living within a 20?min walk of a GP premises. Results Overall, 84.8% of the population is estimated to live within a 20?min walk of a GP premises: 81.2% in the most affluent areas, 98.2% in the most deprived areas, 94.2% in urban and 19.4% in rural areas. This is consistently lower when compared with the population living within a 20?min walk of a community pharmacy. Conclusions Our study shows that the vast majority of the population live within a 20?min walk of a GP premises, with higher proportions in the most deprived areas—a positive primary care law. However, more people live within a 20?min walk of a community pharmacy compared with a GP premises, and this potentially has implications for the commissioning of future services from these healthcare providers in England.
机译:目标(1)确定步行20分钟以内可到达全科医生(GP)场所的英格兰人口百分比(可达性); (2)探索到GP场所的步行距离与城市化程度和社会匮乏之间的关系,(3)比较GP场所与社区药房的可达性-以及城市化程度和社会匮乏程度如何变化。设计该区域分析空间研究使用了英格兰所有GP场所和社区药房的邮政编码。每个邮政编码都分配给一个人口查找表和下超级输出区域(LSOA)。然后,将低收入生活水平与城市化程度(城市,城镇和边缘地区,或村庄,小村庄和孤立的住宅)和剥夺十分位数(使用“ 2010年多重剥夺指数”评分)相匹配。主要结果衡量指标居住在GP诊所步行20分钟以内。结果总体而言,估计有84.8%的人口居住在GP诊所步行20分钟的范围内:最富裕地区为81.2%,最贫困地区为98.2%,城市为94.2%,农村为19.4%。与居住在社区药房步行20分钟以内的人群相比,这一比例始终较低。结论我们的研究表明,绝大多数人口居住在GP诊所步行20分钟以内,而在最贫困地区的比例更高,这是积极的初级保健法。但是,与全科医生诊所相比,居住在社区药房步行20分钟以内的人更多,这可能会对英国这些医疗保健提供者未来服务的启用产生影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号