首页> 外文期刊>Social science and medicine >Measuring dimensions of social capital: evidence from surveys in poor communities in Nicaragua.
【24h】

Measuring dimensions of social capital: evidence from surveys in poor communities in Nicaragua.

机译:衡量社会资本的规模:来自尼加拉瓜贫困社区的调查证据。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A dominant perspective in social capital research emphasizes a "structural" dimension of social capital, consisting of network connections, and a "cognitive" dimension, consisting of attitudes toward trust. Correspondingly, membership in organizations (i.e., membership density) and general trust in people (i.e., social trust) are two indicators commonly used to relate structural and cognitive social capital, respectively, to a variety of health and other outcomes. This study analyzed relationships between membership density, social trust and a more comprehensive set of household-level social capital indicators as well as selected civic and health behaviors in the context of Nicaragua. The sample of respondents was drawn from 6 communities and interviews were conducted with 482 heads of households, resulting in data on 2882 individuals. Factor analyses suggest that membership density loaded strongly (loading=0.81) onto an "organizational participation" factor which contained a number of qualitative characteristics of involvement, including bridging social capital. Further, this structural dimension of social capital appears to be a construct consisting of more than just informal social networks. However, factor analyses suggest that distinctions between levels of trust are warranted in Nicaragua: social trust loaded weakly (loading=0.32) onto a factor characterized by institutional trust in a factor analysis of trust items, and well below 0.30 in a factor analysis of both structural and cognitive dimensions of social capital. A nuanced understanding of these household-level indicators of structural and cognitive social capital held implications for civic and health behaviors. While membership density and institutional trust were positively related to an index of political engagement, social trust was either not related or negatively associated (among urban respondents). Similarly, social trust was associated with over 50% reduced odds of an additional childhood vaccinations whereas institutional trust was associated with increased odds (OR=1.7) of an additional vaccination. The findings highlight the complexity of social capital and the importance of exploring more comprehensive indicators.
机译:在社会资本研究中占主导地位的观点强调社会资本的“结构”维度,包括网络连接,而“认知”维度,包括对信任的态度。相应地,组织的成员资格(即成员密度)和对人的普遍信任(即社会信任)是通常用于将结构性和认知性社会资本分别与各种健康状况和其他结果相关联的两个指标。这项研究分析了尼加拉瓜背景下的成员密度,社会信任和更全面的家庭水平的社会资本指标以及选定的公民和健康行为之间的关系。受访者样本来自6个社区,并与482个户主进行了访谈,获得了2882个人的数据。因子分析表明,成员密度极大地增加了(负载= 0.81)到一个“组织参与”因子上,该因子包含许多参与的定性特征,包括桥接社会资本。此外,社会资本的这种结构维度似乎是一种结构,不仅包括非正式的社会网络。但是,因素分析表明,尼加拉瓜需要对信任程度进行区分:在信任项目的因素分析中,社会信任被弱地加载(负荷= 0.32)到以机构信任为特征的因素上,而在两者之间的因素分析中,远低于0.30社会资本的结构和认知层面。对这些家庭水平的结构性和认知性社会资本指标的细微理解对公民和健康行为具有影响。虽然成员密度和机构信任度与政治参与度指数呈正相关,但社会信任度却不相关或呈负相关(在城市受访者中)。同样,社会信任与额外的儿童接种疫苗减少几率超过50%相关,而机构信任与其他疫苗接种的机会增加(OR = 1.7)相关。调查结果突显了社会资本的复杂性以及探索更全面指标的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号