首页> 外文期刊>Social science and medicine >European public acceptance of euthanasia: Socio-demographic and cultural factors associated with the acceptance of euthanasia in 33 European countries.
【24h】

European public acceptance of euthanasia: Socio-demographic and cultural factors associated with the acceptance of euthanasia in 33 European countries.

机译:欧洲公众对安乐死的接受程度:33个欧洲国家/地区与接受安乐死相关的社会人口统计学和文化因素。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In many European countries, the last decade has been marked by an increasing debate about the acceptability and regulation of euthanasia and other end-of-life decisions in medical practice. Growing public sensibility to a 'right to die' for terminally ill patients has been one of the main constituents of these debates. Within this context, we sought to describe and compare acceptance of euthanasia among the general public in 33 European countries. We used the European Values Study data of 1999-2000 with a total of 41125 respondents (63% response rate) in 33 European countries. The main outcome measure concerned the acceptance of euthanasia (defined as 'terminating the life of the incurably sick', rated on a scale from 1 to 10). Results showed that the acceptance of euthanasia tended to be high in some countries (e.g. the Netherlands, Denmark, France, Sweden), while a markedly low acceptance was found in others (e.g. Romania, Malta and Turkey). A multivariate ordinal regression showed that weaker religious belief was the most important factor associated with a higher acceptance; however, there were also socio-demographic differences: younger cohorts, people from non-manual social classes, and people with a higher educational level tended to have a higher acceptance of euthanasia. While religious belief, socio-demographic factors, and also moral values (i.e. the belief in the right to self-determination) could largely explain the differences between countries, our findings suggest that perceptions regarding euthanasia are probably also influenced by national traditions and history (e.g. Germany). Thus, we demonstrated clear cross-national differences with regard to the acceptance of euthanasia, which can serve as an important basis for further debate and research in the specific countries.
机译:在许多欧洲国家中,过去十年的特点是,有关安乐死的可接受性和监管以及医学实践中其他寿命终结决定的辩论日益增多。公众日益意识到绝症患者的“死亡权”已成为这些辩论的主要内容之一。在此背景下,我们试图描述和比较33个欧洲国家对公众安乐死的接受程度。我们使用1999-2000年的《欧洲价值观研究》数据,在33个欧洲国家中共有41125名受访者(63%的回应率)。主要结果指标涉及安乐死的接受度(定义为“终止无药可救者的生命”,等级从1到10)。结果表明,安乐死在某些国家(例如荷兰,丹麦,法国,瑞典)的接受程度较高,而在其他一些国家(例如罗马尼亚,马耳他和土耳其)则明显较低。多元序数回归表明,较弱的宗教信仰是与更高的接受度相关的最重要因素。但是,在社会人口统计学上也存在差异:较年轻的人群,非人工社会阶层的人和受过较高教育水平的人往往对安乐死的接受程度更高。尽管宗教信仰,社会人口因素以及道德价值观(即对自决权的信仰)在很大程度上可以解释国家之间的差异,但我们的研究结果表明,对安乐死的看法也可能受到民族传统和历史的影响(例如德国)。因此,我们在安乐死的接受方面表现出明显的跨国差异,这可以作为在特定国家进行进一步辩论和研究的重要基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号