首页> 外文期刊>Social science and medicine >Consequences of disease: testing the WHO International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps (ICIDH) model.
【24h】

Consequences of disease: testing the WHO International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps (ICIDH) model.

机译:疾病的后果:测试WHO国际障碍,残疾和残障国际分类(ICIDH)模型。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps (ICIDH) model proposes that there are three consequences of disease, impairment (I), disability (D) and handicap (H) and that they are sequentially related. This paper examines first, whether I, D and H can be measured independently and second, whether there is support for the sequential or causal relationship between the three constructs. Cross-sectional data from a representative sample of 101 disabled adults and longitudinal data from 108 myocardial infarction (MI) and 68 Stroke patients were used. Standard measures of I were used for each clinical condition. Measures of D and H were derived from the British version of the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) and additional measures of D were available for the Stroke group. Judges classified SIP items according to ICIDH definitions of D and H. Correlation, Confirmatory Factor Analyses and Path Analyses were used to examine the main hypotheses. Valid measures of D and H were derived and there was evidence of separation of the three constructs for the Stroke patients but not for the other groups. For both Stroke and MI, I was not predictive of D and H. For Stroke, the best path model included a path from D to H, but not from H to D and this was found for self-report and performance measures of D. Using these measures, the ICIDH model was supported in that D predicted H for stroke, but there was no support for a path between I and D or between I and H. Further it was not always possible to distinguish the three constructs. Possible limitations in the measures and in the ICIDH model as a testable scientific model are discussed.
机译:国际障碍,残疾和障碍分类(ICIDH)模型提出,疾病有三种后果,即障碍(I),残疾(D)和障碍(H),并且它们是顺序相关的。本文首先检查I,D和H是否可以独立测量,其次检查是否支持这三种结构之间的顺序关系或因果关系。使用来自101名残疾成年人的代表性样本的横截面数据以及来自108例心肌梗塞(MI)和68例中风患者的纵向数据。 I的标准量度用于每种临床状况。 D和H的测量值来自英国版《疾病影响概况》(SIP),D的其他测量值可用于卒中组。法官根据ICIDH对D和H的定义对SIP项目进行了分类。使用相关性,验证性因子分析和路径分析来检验主要假设。得出了D和H的有效量度,并且有证据表明中风患者可以分离这三种结构,而其他人群则没有。对于Stroke和MI,我都无法预测D和H。对于Stroke,最佳路径模型包括从D到H的路径,但不包括从H到D的路径,这是针对D的自我报告和绩效评估而发现的。使用这些措施,ICIDH模型得到了支持,因为D可以预测H的中风,但并不支持I与D之间或I与H之间的路径。此外,并非总是能够区分这三种结构。讨论了措施和作为可检验的科学模型的ICIDH模型中可能存在的局限性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号