首页> 外文期刊>Social science and medicine >Reprint of: Dream vs. reality: Seven case-studies on the desirability and feasibility of cross-border hospital collaboration in Europe
【24h】

Reprint of: Dream vs. reality: Seven case-studies on the desirability and feasibility of cross-border hospital collaboration in Europe

机译:转载:梦想与现实:关于欧洲跨境医院合作的可取性和可行性的七个案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Despite being a niche phenomenon, cross-border health care collaboration receives a lot of attention in the EU and figures visibly on the policy agenda, in particular since the policy process which eventually led to the adoption of Directive 2011/24/EU. One of the underlying assumptions is that cross-border collaboration is desirable, providing justification to both the European Commission and to border-region stakeholders for promoting it. The purpose of this paper is to question this assumption and to examine the role of actors in pushing (or not) for cross-border collaboration. The analysis takes place in two parts. First, the EU policies to promote cross-border collaboration and the tools employed are examined, namely (a) use of European funds to sponsor concrete border-region collaboration projects, (b) use of European funds to sponsor research which gives visibility to cross-border collaboration, and (c) use of the European Commission's newly acquired legal mandate to encourage "Member States to cooperate in cross-border health care provision in border-regions" (Art. 10) and support "Member States in the development of European reference networks between health care providers and centres of expertise" (Art. 12). Second, evidence gathered in 2011-2013 from seven European border-regions on hospital cross-border collaboration is systematically reviewed to assess the reality of cross-border collaboration - can it work and when, and why do actors engage in cross-border collaboration? The preliminary findings suggest that while the EU plays a prominent role in some border-region initiatives, cross-border collaboration needs such a specific set of circumstances to work that it is questionable whether it can effectively be promoted. Moreover, local actors make use of the EU (as a source of funding, legislation or legitimisation) to serve their needs. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
机译:尽管这是一种利基现象,但跨境医疗保健合作在欧盟中受到了很多关注,并且在政策议程上可见数字,尤其是在政策过程最终导致采纳指令2011/24 / EU以来。基本假设之一是希望进行跨境合作,这为欧盟委员会和边境地区利益相关者提供了促进这种合作的理由。本文的目的是质疑这一假设,并检验参与者在推动(或不推动)跨境协作中的作用。分析分为两个部分。首先,研究了欧盟促进跨境合作的政策和所采用的工具,即(a)使用欧洲资金赞助具体的边境地区合作项目,(b)使用欧洲资金赞助研究,使跨界合作可见边界合作,以及(c)利用欧盟委员会新获得的法律授权来鼓励“成员国在边境地区的跨境卫生保健提供方面进行合作”(第10条),并支持“成员国在发展欧洲卫生保健提供者和专业知识中心之间的参考网络”(第12条)。其次,系统地审查了2011-2013年从欧洲七个边境地区收集的关于医院跨界合作的证据,以评估跨界合作的现实-它能起作用,何时起作用,为什么参与者参与跨界合作?初步调查结果表明,尽管欧盟在某些边境地区计划中扮演着重要角色,但跨境合作需要如此特殊的环境来运作,以至于能否有效地促进其存在疑问。此外,当地参与者利用欧盟(作为资金,立法或合法化的来源)来满足其需求。 (C)2014由Elsevier Ltd.出版

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号