首页> 外文期刊>Social science and medicine >Civil society and the Health and Social Care Act in England and Wales: Theory and praxis for the twenty-first century
【24h】

Civil society and the Health and Social Care Act in England and Wales: Theory and praxis for the twenty-first century

机译:公民社会与英格兰和威尔士的《健康与社会关怀法》:二十一世纪的理论与实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this paper we revisit the notion of civil society in the light of recent attempts to privatize health care in England via the passing of the Health and Social Care Act of 2013. This legislation promises a recommodification of the National Health Service (NHS) in England. The Bill was bitterly contested during its passage through parliament, most vigorously in 2011. Much of the opposition occurred at a time of widespread, global rebellion, most notably in the 'Arab uprisings' and through the 'occupy movement'. Despite a plethora of protests, we argue, a non-porous boundary between what we call the 'protest sector' of civil society and the wider public sphere of the lifeworld has become apparent in England. A good deal of collective action, whether campaign-focused (like opposition to the Health and Social Care Bill) or more generalized (like rejections of corporate greed), has so far proved ineffective, at least in the short-term; no crisis of legitimation is apparent. We highlight a new 'class/command dynamic', leading to oligarchic rule, in the present era of financial capitalism. We use this health care case-study to reexamine the notion of civil society and its changing properties in what Castells calls a 'networked society'. The contribution ends with a discussion of the role of the sociologist re-civil society and the advocacy of both 'action' and 'foresight sociologies'. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在本文中,我们根据最近通过2013年《健康与社会关怀法》使英格兰的医疗保健私有化的尝试,重新审视了民间社会的概念。该立法有望对英国国家卫生局(NHS)进行重新设计。该法案在通过议会时遭到了激烈的辩论,在2011年最为激烈。多数反对派发生在广泛的全球叛乱时期,尤其是在“阿拉伯起义”和“占领运动”中。我们认为,尽管有很多抗议活动,但在英国,我们所称的公民社会的“抗议部门”与生活世界的更广泛公共领域之间已经形成了无孔的界限。到目前为止,至少在短期内,大量的集体行动,无论是针对运动的行动(如反对《健康与社会关怀法案》的反对)还是更为笼统的行动(如对公司贪婪的拒绝),都无济于事。没有合法化的危机是显而易见的。我们重点介绍了在当今金融资本主义时代导致寡头统治的新“阶级/命令动态”。我们使用这项医疗保健案例研究来重新审视卡斯特尔所说的“网络社会”中的公民社会及其不断变化的特性。文章最后讨论了社会学家的公民社会的作用以及“行动”和“前瞻性社会学”的倡导。 (C)2014 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号