...
首页> 外文期刊>Social science and medicine >'What matters most:' A cultural mechanism moderating structural vulnerability and moral experience of mental illness stigma
【24h】

'What matters most:' A cultural mechanism moderating structural vulnerability and moral experience of mental illness stigma

机译:“最重要的是:”一种文化机制,可调节精神疾病的结构脆弱性和道德经验受到的耻辱

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To understand Chinese immigrants' experiences with mental illness stigma and mental health disparities, we integrate frameworks of 'structural vulnerability' and 'moral experience' to identify how interaction between structural discrimination and cultural engagements might shape stigma. Fifty Chinese immigrants, including 64% Fuzhounese immigrants who experienced particularly harsh socio-economical deprivation, from two Chinese bilingual psychiatric inpatient units in New York City were interviewed from 2006 to 2010 about their experiences of mental illness stigma. Interview questions were derived from 4 stigma measures, covering various life domains. Participants were asked to elaborate their rating of measure items, and thus provided open-ended, narrative data. Analysis of the narrative data followed a deductive approach, guided by frameworks of structural discrimination and "what matters most" - a cultural mechanism signifying meaningful participation in the community. After identifying initial coding classifications, analysis focused on the interface between the two main concepts. Results indicated that experiences with mental illness stigma were contingent on the degree to which immigrants were able to participate in work to achieve "what mattered most" in their cultural context, i.e., accumulation of financial resources. Structural vulnerability - being situated in an inferior position when facing structural discrimination - made access to affordable mental health services challenging. As such, structural discrimination increased healthcare spending and interfered with financial accumulation, often resulting in future treatment nonadherence and enforcing mental health disparities. Study participants' internalizing their structurally-vulnerable position further led to a depreciated sense of self, resulting in a reduced capacity to advocate for healthcare system changes. Paradoxically, the multi-layered structural marginalization experienced by Chinese immigrants with mental illness allowed those who maintained capacity to work to retain social status even while holding a mental illness status. Mental health providers may prioritize work participation to shift service users' positions within the hierarchy of structural vulnerability.
机译:为了了解中国移民在精神疾病方面的污名和精神健康差异的经历,我们将“结构脆弱性”和“道德经验”的框架进行了整合,以确定结构性歧视和文化参与之间的相互作用如何塑造污名。 2006年至2010年,他们从纽约市的两名中国双语精神病住院患者中接受了50名中国移民的调查,其中包括64%经历了特别严峻的社会经济剥夺的福州移民。面试问题来自4个污名测度,涵盖了各个生活领域。要求参与者详细说明其对测量项目的评分,从而提供不限成员名额的叙述性数据。对叙事数据的分析采用了一种演绎方法,并以结构性歧视和“最重要”的框架为指导,这种文化机制表示有意义地参与社区活动。确定初始编码分类后,分析重点放在两个主要概念之间的接口上。结果表明,对精神疾病的污名化经验取决于移民能够在何种程度上参加工作以在其文化背景下实现“最重要的事情”,即财务资源的积累。结构性脆弱性-面对结构性歧视时处于劣势地位-使得人们难以获得负担得起的精神卫生服务。因此,结构性歧视增加了医疗保健支出,并干扰了财务积累,通常会导致未来治疗不依从并加剧心理健康差异。研究参与者内部化了他们在结构上易受伤害的位置,这进一步导致了自我意识的贬值,导致倡导改变医疗体系的能力下降。矛盾的是,患有精神疾病的中国移民经历了多层次的结构性边缘化,使那些即使有精神疾病但仍保持工作能力以保持社会地位的人。精神卫生服务提供者可以优先考虑工作参与,以在结构脆弱性层次内转移服务用户的位置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号