...
首页> 外文期刊>Social science and medicine >Conceptualising and measuring the well-being of people with psychosis: Systematic review and narrative synthesis
【24h】

Conceptualising and measuring the well-being of people with psychosis: Systematic review and narrative synthesis

机译:概念化和衡量精神病患者的福祉:系统评价和叙事综合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Well-being has become a prominent term in the political arena in recent years. However, in research the concept and use of well-being has been unclear, especially in the context of severe mental illness such as psychosis. This systematic review aims to characterise the evidence base relating to well-being in people with psychosis, by reviewing how well-being is measured, developing a new conceptual framework, and summarising empirical evaluations of psychosocial interventions to improve well-being. We conducted a systematic review and narrative synthesis of controlled trials of interventions investigating well-being in people with psychosis. The 28 studies meeting the inclusion criteria used 20 different measures of well-being. Five dimensions of well-being emerged: non-observable, observable, proximal, distal, and self-defined. Interventions to improve well-being vary widely. The investigated interventions have been targeted at non-observable, observable and proximal levels, while evaluation measures span all five dimensions. This review offers an evidence based conceptual framework of well-being which can provide an empirical basis for organising future well-being research in psychosis. The review also shows that the evidence base for interventions is small and methodologically weak. Recommendations are made for choosing well-being measures for future research.
机译:近年来,幸福已成为政治舞台上的一个重要名词。但是,在研究中,对幸福的概念和使用尚不清楚,尤其是在诸如精神病等严重精神疾病的情况下。这项系统的综述旨在通过回顾如何衡量幸福感,建立新的概念框架并总结对心理社会干预措施以改善幸福感的实证评估,来表征与精神病患者幸福感相关的证据基础。我们对精神病患者的幸福感进行干预的对照试验进行了系统的回顾和叙述性综合。符合纳入标准的28项研究使用了20种不同的幸福感度量。出现了五个方面的幸福感:不可观察,可观察,近端,远端和自定义。改善幸福感的干预措施千差万别。所调查的干预措施针对不可观察,可观察和近端的水平,而评估措施则涵盖所有五个方面。这篇综述提供了一个基于证据的幸福概念框架,该框架可以为组织未来精神病的幸福研究提供经验基础。审查还表明,干预措施的证据基础很小且方法论薄弱。提出了一些建议,以便为将来的研究选择安康措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号