...
首页> 外文期刊>Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology >A comparative analysis of disability in individuals with bipolar affective disorder and schizophrenia in a sub-Saharan African mental health hospital: Towards evidence-guided rehabilitation intervention
【24h】

A comparative analysis of disability in individuals with bipolar affective disorder and schizophrenia in a sub-Saharan African mental health hospital: Towards evidence-guided rehabilitation intervention

机译:撒哈拉以南非洲精神卫生医院双相情感障碍和精神分裂症患者的残疾比较分析:循证康复干预

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: Bipolar affective disorder (BAD) and schizophrenia are two severe psychotic conditions that are associated with disability. The present study was designed to compare the pattern of disability between clinically stable individuals with BAD and schizophrenia in a sub-Saharan mental health facility. Methods: A total of 200 consecutive participants (made up of 100 each among clinically stable individuals with BAD and schizophrenia) were recruited. All participants had their diagnoses confirmed using Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders (SCID), after which the designed questionnaire and the 36-item World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule interview (WHODAS II) were administered to them. Results: In this study, the level of disability among participants with BAD was better compared to those with schizophrenia as determined by mean WHODAS score of 24.93 and 27.02, respectively. Similarly, there was a significant difference between participants with BAD and schizophrenia with respect to four domains of the WHODAS-II, viz, self-care (p < 0.001), getting along with others (p < 0.001), life activities (p < 0.001) and participation in the society (p < 0.001). The factors that were significantly associated with disability in the two groups (BAD and schizophrenia) were: unemployment status (p < 0.001) and remittance source of income (p < 0.001), while those that spent not more than N2,000 (13 dollars) per month on treatment (p = 0.004) were observed to be less disabled. Conclusions: Overall, participants with BAD fared better in the level of disability and most of the measured domains of disability in comparison with those with schizophrenia. Both socio-demographic and treatment-related factors seem to define the pattern disability among participants. Thus, evidence-guided preventive and rehabilitative treatment strategies directed against functional impairment using prioritized model among individuals with BAD and schizophrenia are advocated.
机译:目的:双相情感障碍(BAD)和精神分裂症是与残疾有关的两种严重的精神病。本研究旨在比较撒哈拉以南的精神卫生机构中具有BAD和精神分裂症的临床稳定个体之间的残疾模式。方法:总共招募了200名连续参与者(由临床稳定的BAD和精神分裂症患者组成,每人100名)。所有参与者的诊断均通过针对DSM-IV-TR轴I障碍的结构性临床访谈(SCID)进行了确认,然后对他们进行了设计问卷和36项世界卫生组织残疾评估时间表访谈(WHODAS II)。结果:在本研究中,通过平均WHODAS得分分别为24.93和27.02,BAD参与者的残障水平要优于精神分裂症。同样,BAD和精神分裂症患者在WHODAS-II的四个方面之间存在显着差异,即自我护理(p <0.001),与他人相处(p <0.001),生活活动(p < 0.001)和参与社会(p <0.001)。两组中与残疾显着相关的因素(BAD和精神分裂症)为:失业状况(p <0.001)和汇款收入来源(p <0.001),而花费不超过N2,000的人(13美元) )每月接受治疗(p = 0.004)的残障率较低。结论:总体而言,与精神分裂症患者相比,BAD参与者的残疾水平和大部分残疾领域表现更好。社会人口统计学因素和与治疗有关的因素似乎都定义了参与者的模式障碍。因此,在BAD和精神分裂症患者中,提倡使用优先模型针对功能受损的循证预防和康复治疗策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号