...
首页> 外文期刊>Social and Environmental Accountability Journal >W(h)ither Ecology? The Triple Bottom Line, The Global Reporting Initiative, and Corporate Sustainability Reporting
【24h】

W(h)ither Ecology? The Triple Bottom Line, The Global Reporting Initiative, and Corporate Sustainability Reporting

机译:谁(生态)?三重底线,全球报告倡议组织和企业可持续发展报告

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The paper argues that sustainability reporting with its use of Triple Bottom Line (TBL), Global Reporting Initiative and the emerging Integrated Reporting protocol is not fit for purpose; because the reports, through their use of such protocols, are not tackling the urgent issue of our time - 'sustaining the life-supporting ecological systems on which humanity and other species depend' (p. 13). They argue the 'one thing you cannot learn from a sustainability report is the contribution to/detraction from sustainability that the organisation has made' (p. 17). Further because 'nature and ecology know nothing of our businesses and institutions, and will not reconfigure along our modern institutional lines' (p. 24), we must. Yet sustainability reporting does not tackle this issue of reconfiguration; rather it focuses purely on what has happened, but not how those happenings make our institutions and ultimately humanity follow a more or less sustainable path. Hence the title of their paper - 'W(h)ither Ecology?'
机译:本文认为,采用三重底线(TBL),全球报告倡议组织和新兴的综合报告协议的可持续发展报告不适合目的;因为这些报告通过使用这样的协议,并未解决我们时代的紧迫问题-“维持人类和其他物种赖以生存的维持生命的生态系统”(第13页)。他们认为“您无法从可持续性报告中学到的一件事是组织对可持续性的贡献/从中做出的贡献”(第17页)。此外,由于“自然和生态对我们的业务和机构一无所知,并且不会沿我们现代的机构路线重新配置”(第24页),因此我们必须这样做。然而,可持续发展报告并未解决重新配置的问题。相反,它只关注发生的事情,而不关注这些事情如何使我们的机构以及最终人类遵循或多或少的可持续性道路。因此,他们论文的标题是“生态”?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号