首页> 外文期刊>Sexually Transmitted Infections >Evaluation of a rapid one-step immunochromatographic test and two immunoenzymatic assays for the detection of anti-Treponema pallidum antibodies.
【24h】

Evaluation of a rapid one-step immunochromatographic test and two immunoenzymatic assays for the detection of anti-Treponema pallidum antibodies.

机译:评估快速的一步免疫色谱测试和两种免疫酶检测法,以检测抗梅毒螺旋体抗体。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The control of syphilis depends on screening of the population at risk and is usually performed using the Treponema pallidum particle agglutination test (TPPA). Outside Europe the rapid plasma reagin test (RPR) or venereal disease research laboratory test is most often used for screening purposes. Because of the drawbacks in current diagnostic procedures, ie, long turnaround time, the need is felt for a rapid and simple test that can potentially be performed on whole blood. Objective and STUDY DESIGN: In this study a one-step immunochromatographic test (Biorapid Syphilis) and two ELISA, the Bioelisa Syphilis 3.0 and ETI-Treponema Plus, were evaluated. METHODS: Serum samples were collected between February 2000 and May 2006 at the University Hospital in Maastricht, The Netherlands. 145 TPPA-positive sera, confirmed by fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption (FTA-Abs, treponemal test) and/or RPR (non-treponemal) were included. Furthermore, 41 sera from healthy controls and 144 TPPA-negative sera from controls with underlying conditions that might interfere with T pallidum serology were collected. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of the Biorapid Syphilis, Bioelisa Syphilis 3.0 and ETI-Treponema Plus were 92% and 79%, 100% and 100% and 100% and 100%, respectively, with our selected sera. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of both ELISA was excellent in our study and is favoured over the TPPA because of its ability to be run on an automated system. The sensitivity and specificity of the Biorapid Syphilis were considered too low to implement the test in a hospital laboratory in a developed country but it might be useful in primary healthcare settings in developing countries.
机译:背景:梅毒的控制取决于对高危人群的筛查,通常使用梅毒螺旋体颗粒凝集试验(TPPA)进行。在欧洲以外,快速血浆反应素检测(RPR)或性病研究实验室检测最常用于筛查目的。由于当前诊断程序中的缺陷,即,较长的周转时间,因此需要一种可能对全血进行的快速而简单的测试。目的和研究设计:本研究评估了一步免疫层析测试(Biorapid Syphilis)和两种ELISA,即Bioelisa Syphilis 3.0和ETI-Treponema Plus。方法:从2000年2月至2006年5月在荷兰马斯特里赫特的大学医院收集血清样品。包括145个TPPA阳性血清,这些血清通过荧光性螺旋体抗体吸收(FTA-Abs,螺旋体测试)和/或RPR(非螺旋体)确认。此外,还收集了来自健康对照组的41份血清和来自具有可能干扰苍白T血清学的潜在疾病的对照组的144 TPPA阴性血清。结果:对于我们选择的血清,Biorapid梅毒,Bioelisa Syphilis 3.0和ETI-Treponema Plus的敏感性和特异性分别为92%和79%,100%和100%,100%和100%。结论:两种ELISA的性能在我们的研究中均非常出色,并且由于其在自动化系统上运行的能力而优于TPPA。梅毒快速梅毒的敏感性和特异性被认为太低而无法在发达国家的医院实验室中进行该测试,但在发展中国家的初级医疗机构中可能有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号