首页> 外文期刊>Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism >A double-blind, randomized, saline-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of EUFLEXXA for treatment of painful osteoarthritis of the knee, with an open-label safety extension (the FLEXX trial).
【24h】

A double-blind, randomized, saline-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of EUFLEXXA for treatment of painful osteoarthritis of the knee, with an open-label safety extension (the FLEXX trial).

机译:一项双盲,随机,盐水对照研究,采用EUFLEXXA进行开放性安全性扩展(FLEXX试验),以研究EUFLEXXA在治疗膝部疼痛性骨关节炎中的功效和安全性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To report the FLEXX trial, the first well-controlled study assessing the safety and efficacy of Euflexxa (1% sodium hyaluronate; IA-BioHA) therapy for knee osteoarthritis (OA) at 26 weeks. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, saline-controlled study. Subjects with chronic knee OA were randomized to 3 weekly intra-articular (IA) injections of either buffered saline (IA-SA) or IA-BioHA (20 mg/2 ml). The primary efficacy outcome was subject recorded difference in least-squares means between IA-BioHA and IA-SA in subjects' change from baseline to week 26 following a 50-foot walk test, measured via 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary outcome measures included Osteoarthritis Research Society International responder index, Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index VA 3.1 subscales, patient global assessment, rescue medication, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) by the SF-36. Safety was assessed by monitoring and reporting vital signs, physical examination of the target knee following injection, adverse events, and concomitant medications. RESULTS: Five hundred eighty-eight subjects were randomized to either IA-BioHA (n = 293) or IA-SA (n = 295), with an 88% 26 week completion rate. No statistical differences were noted between the treatment groups at baseline. In the IA-BioHA group, mean VAS scores decreased by 25.7 mm, compared with 18.5 mm in the IA-SA group. This corresponded to a median reduction of 53% from baseline for IA-BioHA and a 38% reduction for IA-SA. The difference in least-squares means was -6.6 mm (P = 0.002). Secondary outcome measures were consistent with significant improvement in Osteoarthritis Research Society International responder index, HRQoL, and function. Both IA-SA and IA-BioHA injections were well tolerated, with a low incidence of adverse events that were equally distributed between groups. Injection-site reactions were reported by 1 (<1%) subject in the IA-SA group and 2 (1%) in the IA-BioHA group. CONCLUSIONS: IA-BioHA therapy resulted in significant OA knee pain relief at 26 weeks compared with IA-SA. Subjects treated with IA-BioHA also experienced significant improvements in joint function, treatment satisfaction, and HRQoL.
机译:目的:要报告FLEXX试验,这是第一个评估26周的Euflexxa(1%透明质酸钠; IA-BioHA)治疗膝部骨关节炎(OA)的安全性和有效性的良好对照研究。方法:这是一项随机,双盲,多中心,盐水对照研究。患有慢性膝盖OA的受试者被随机分配至每3周一次关节内(IA)注射缓冲盐水(IA-SA)或IA-BioHA(20 mg / 2 ml)。主要疗效结果是受试者记录了从50英尺步行测试后受试者从基线到第26周的IA-BioHA和IA-SA在IA-BioHA和IA-SA之间的最小二乘均差,通过100毫米视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量。次要结果指标包括骨关节炎研究协会国际响应者指数,西安大略麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数VA 3.1分量表,患者总体评估,急救药物以及SF-36的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)。通过监测和报告生命体征,注射后对目标膝关节进行身体检查,不良事件和并用药物来评估安全性。结果:588名受试者被随机分为IA-BioHA(n = 293)或IA-SA(n = 295),26周完成率为88%。基线时各治疗组之间未发现统计学差异。 IA-BioHA组的平均VAS评分降低了25.7 mm,而IA-SA组的则为18.5 mm。这对应于IA-BioHA与基线相比降低了53%,IA-SA与基线相比降低了38%。最小二乘均方差为-6.6毫米(P = 0.002)。次要结局指标与骨关节炎研究协会国际响应者指数,HRQoL和功能的显着改善相一致。 IA-SA和IA-BioHA注射剂均具有良好的耐受性,不良事件发生率低,在各组之间平均分配。 IA-SA组中有1名(<1%)受试者报告了注射部位反应,IA-BioHA组中有2名(1%)报告了注射部位反应。结论:与IA-SA相比,IA-BioHA治疗在26周时可显着缓解OA膝关节疼痛。接受IA-BioHA治疗的受试者的关节功能,治疗满意度和HRQoL也有显着改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号