首页> 外文期刊>Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism >Barriers to Participant Retention in Knee Osteoarthritis Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review
【24h】

Barriers to Participant Retention in Knee Osteoarthritis Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review

机译:保留膝关节骨关节炎临床试验的障碍:系统评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: We investigated the reasons and rates of attrition in knee osteoarthritis trials through a systematic review of randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trials. Methods: Randomized trials were identified by searches conducted in MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We then attempted to identify and describe the reasons for attrition and their associated themes. For each theme, we calculated the rate of patients who discontinued a trial from the total number of dropouts in each trial. The rates obtained with different trials were combined using a random effects model. We also performed a random effects meta-regression analysis to identify sources associated with the rates. Results: Overall, 259 studies consisting of 266 trials and 13,593 patients were included in the analysis. From these, we short-listed 54 attrition reasons and identified 21 key themes. "Ineffectiveness" and "adverse event" were the reasons frequently reported by >5% of the dropouts. On further investigation of the theme ineffectiveness, the attrition rate was associated with delivery routes of treatment, trial duration, flare design, prohibition of usual analgesics, and allowing the use of escape medication. In cases of adverse events, we found that the treatment type and delivery route affected the attrition rate. Conclusions: Our findings not only support the importance of the intention-to-treat analysis, but also suggest the possibility of controlling the attrition at the study level. ? 2013 Elsevier Inc.
机译:目的:我们通过对随机,安慰剂对照的临床试验进行系统回顾,调查了膝骨关节炎试验中磨损的原因和发生率。方法:通过在MEDLINE,SCOPUS和对照试验的Cochrane中央登记册中进行检索来鉴定随机试验。然后,我们尝试确定并描述损耗的原因及其相关主题。对于每个主题,我们从每个试验的辍学总数中计算出中止试验的患者比例。使用随机效应模型合并通过不同试验获得的比率。我们还执行了随机效应元回归分析,以识别与费率相关的来源。结果:总体上,包括266个试验的259项研究和13,593例患者被纳入分析。从中我们筛选出了54个损耗原因,并确定了21个关键主题。 “无效”和“不良事件”是> 5%的辍学学生经常报告的原因。在进一步研究主题无效性方面,损耗率与治疗的给药途径,试验持续时间,眩晕设计,禁止常规镇痛药以及允许使用逃生药物有关。在发生不良事件的情况下,我们发现治疗类型和分娩途径会影响损耗率。结论:我们的发现不仅支持意向性治疗分析的重要性,而且还提出了在研究水平上控制损耗的可能性。 ? 2013爱思唯尔公司

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号