首页> 外文期刊>Clinical rehabilitation >Clinical efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials
【24h】

Clinical efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials

机译:膝关节骨关节炎体外冲击波治疗的临床疗效:随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃回归

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: This study determined the clinical efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy and the predictors of its efficacy for knee osteoarthritis. Data Sources: Electronic databases and search engines, namely MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library Database, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), China Academic Journals Full-text Database, and Google Scholar, were searched until 5 March 2019, for randomized controlled trials without restrictions on language and publication year. Review Methods: Eligible trials and extracted data were identified by two independent investigators. The included articles were subjected to a meta-analysis and risk of bias assessment. Outcomes of interest included treatment success rate, pain, and physical function outcomes. A meta-regression analysis was performed to determine the predictors of treatment outcomes following shockwave therapy. Results: We included 50 trials (4844 patients) with a median (range) PEDro score of 6 (5-9). Meta-analyses results revealed an overall significant effect favoring shockwave therapy on the treatment success rate (odds ratio 3.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.21-4.69, P < 0.00001; heterogeneity (I-2) = 62%), pain reduction (standardized mean difference (SMD) -2.02, 95% CI -2.38 to -1.67, P < 0.00001; I-2 = 95%), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index function outcome (SMD -2.71, 95% CI -3.50 to -1.92, P < 0.00001; I-2 = 97%). Follow-up duration and energy flux density were independent significant predictors of shockwave efficacy. Conclusion: Shockwave therapy is beneficial for knee osteoarthritis. Shockwave dosage, particularly the energy level and intervention duration, may have different contributions to treatment efficacy.
机译:目的:本研究确定了体外冲击波治疗的临床疗效和膝关节骨关节炎的疗效的预测因子。数据源:电子数据库和搜索引擎,即Medline,PubMed,Embase,Cochrane Library数据库,物理疗法证据数据库(PEDRO),中国学术期刊全文数据库和Google Scholar,截至2019年3月5日,为随机对照试验没有对语言和出版年份的限制。审查方法:两个独立调查人员确定了符合条件的试验和提取数据。随附的文章进行了偏见评估的荟萃分析和风险。感兴趣的结果包括治疗成功率,疼痛和物理功能结果。进行了元回归分析以确定冲击疗法后治疗结果的预测因子。结果:我们包括50项试验(4844名患者),中位数(范围)Pedro得分为6(5-9)。 Meta-Analyses结果表明,对治疗成功率的极大显着效果有利于冲击波治疗(差距3.22,95%置信区间(CI)2.21-4.69,P <0.00001;异质性(I-2)= 62%,减少疼痛(标准化平均差异(SMD)-2.02,95%CI -2.38至-1.67,P <0.00001; I-2 = 95%),以及西部的安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数函数结果(SMD -2.71,95%CI - 3.50至-1.92,p <0.00001; I-2 = 97%)。随访持续时间和能量通量密度是冲击波功效的独立显着预测因子。结论:冲击波治疗对膝关节骨关节炎有益。 Shockwave剂量,特别是能量水平和干预持续时间,可能对治疗疗效产生不同的贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号