首页> 外文期刊>Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism >A systematic review of recommendations and guidelines for the management of osteoarthritis: The Chronic Osteoarthritis Management Initiative of the U.S. Bone and Joint Initiative
【24h】

A systematic review of recommendations and guidelines for the management of osteoarthritis: The Chronic Osteoarthritis Management Initiative of the U.S. Bone and Joint Initiative

机译:对骨关节炎管理的建议和指南的系统评价:《美国骨与关节联合会的慢性骨关节炎管理计划》

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: Although a number of osteoarthritis (OA) management guidelines exist, uptake has been suboptimal. Our aim was to review and critically evaluate existing OA management guidelines to better understand potential issues and barriers. Methods: A systematic review of the literature in MEDLINE published from January 1, 2000 to April 1, 2013 was performed and supplemented by bibliographic reviews, following PRISMA guidelines and a written protocol. Following initial title and abstract screening, 2 authors independently reviewed full-text articles; a third settled disagreements. Two independent reviewers extracted data into a standardized form. Two authors independently assessed guideline quality using the AGREE II instrument; three generated summary recommendations based on the extracted guideline data. Results: Overall, 16 articles were included in the final review. There was broad agreement on recommendations by the various organizations. For non-pharmacologic modalities, education/self-management, exercise, weight loss if overweight, walking aids as indicated, and thermal modalities were widely recommended. For appropriate patients, joint replacement was recommended; arthroscopy with debridement was not recommended for symptomatic knee OA. Pharmacologic modalities most recommended included acetaminophen/paracetamol (first line) and NSAIDs (topical or oral, second line). Intra-articular corticosteroids were generally recommended for hip and knee OA. Controversy remains about the use of acupuncture, knee braces, heel wedges, intra-articular hyaluronans, and glucosamine/chondroitin. Conclusions: The relative agreement on many OA management recommendations across organizations indicates a problem with dissemination and implementation rather than a lack of quality guidelines. Future efforts should focus on optimizing implementation in primary care settings, where the majority of OA care occurs.
机译:目的:尽管存在许多骨关节炎(OA)管理指南,但摄取量并不理想。我们的目的是审查并严格评估现有的OA管理指南,以更好地了解潜在的问题和障碍。方法:按照PRISMA指南和书面协议,对2000年1月1日至2013年4月1日发表的MEDLINE文献进行系统的综述,并辅以书目综述。经过初步标题和摘要筛选后,有2位作者独立审阅了全文。第三个解决的分歧。两名独立的审阅者将数据提取为标准格式。两位作者使用AGREE II仪器独立评估了指南质量;根据提取的指南数据生成三个摘要建议。结果:总的来说,最后的评论中有16篇文章。各个组织的建议已达成广泛共识。对于非药理学方法,广泛推荐教育/自我管理,运动,超重引起的体重减轻,指示的助行器和热学方法。对于合适的患者,建议进行关节置换。不建议对有症状的膝骨关节炎行清创性关节镜检查。最推荐的药理形式包括对乙酰氨基酚/扑热息痛(第一线)和非甾体抗炎药(局部或口服,第二线)。通常建议对髋关节和膝关节OA使用关节内激素治疗。关于针灸,护膝,脚跟楔形,关节内透明质酸和氨基葡萄糖/软骨素的使用仍存在争议。结论:跨组织对许多OA管理建议的相对共识表明,在传播和实施方面存在问题,而不是缺乏质量指南。未来的工作应集中在优化大多数OA护理发生的基层医疗机构中的实施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号