首页> 外文期刊>Cardiovascular revascularization medicine: including molecular interventions >Can intravascular ultrasound guidance modify the efficacy of drug-eluting stent over bare-metal stent in an aorto-ostial lesion?
【24h】

Can intravascular ultrasound guidance modify the efficacy of drug-eluting stent over bare-metal stent in an aorto-ostial lesion?

机译:在主动脉病变中,血管内超声引导能否改变药物洗脱支架优于裸金属支架的功效?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: We compared the efficacy of drug-eluting stents (DESs) versus bare-metal stents (BMSs) in de novo and native aorto-ostial lesions (AOLs) guided by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). METHOD: Thirty-eight patients underwent DES implantation for 38 AOLs; 35 with sirolimus-eluting stents, and three with paclitaxel-eluting stents (DES group). The control group was composed of 40 AOLs treated by BMS. The incidence of the primary composite end point of all-cause mortality, Q-wave myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization (TVR) as TVR-major adverse cardiac event (TVR-MACE) was evaluated during a 1-year follow-up. Clinical and IVUS parameters were compared between the DES and BMS groups, and Cox hazards model was used to calculate hazard ratios of several factors for the 1-year TVR-MACE. RESULTS: Although the vessel, plaque, and stent volumes were significantly larger after the procedures in the DES group owing to longer lesions (18.3 +/- 5.1 vs. 13.2 +/- 5.9 mm, P<.001), the stent volume index (10.8 +/- 2.6 vs. 12.4 +/- 3.3, P=.024) was much smaller than that in the BMS group. During the 1-year follow-up, there were 13 TVR-MACEs in all patients (13% in DES vs. 20% in BMS, P=.4 by Kaplan-Meier analysis). The Cox hazards model did not indicate any specific unfavorable factor for the 1-year TVR-MACE. CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed equality between DES and BMS on de novo and native AOLs about the 1-year TVR-MACE rate, even though a DES was used in longer and bulkier lesions as compared to BMS.
机译:目的:我们比较了药物洗脱支架(DES)和裸金属支架(BMS)在血管内超声(IVUS)引导的从头和自然主动脉口病变(AOL)中的疗效。方法:38例患者接受了38种AOL的DES植入治疗; 35例使用西罗莫司洗脱支架,3例使用紫杉醇洗脱支架(DES组)。对照组由BMS治疗的40种AOL组成。在1年的随访期间,评估了全因死亡率,Q波心肌梗死和靶血管血运重建(TVR)作为TVR主要不良心脏事件(TVR-MACE)的主要复合终点的发生率。比较DES组和BMS组的临床和IVUS参数,并使用Cox危害模型计算1年TVR-MACE的若干因素的危害比率。结果:尽管在DES组中,由于病变更长(18.3 +/- 5.1 vs. 13.2 +/- 5.9 mm,P <.001),但在血管扩张术,支架和斑块体积明显增加后,支架体积指数(10.8 +/- 2.6对12.4 +/- 3.3,P = .024)比BMS组小得多。在1年的随访期间,所有患者中均存在13例TVR-MACE(DES中13%,BMS中20%,Kaplan-Meier分析显示P = .4)。 Cox危害模型没有指出1年TVR-MACE的任何特定不利因素。结论:本研究显示,从头开始使用的DES和BMS在原生AOL和原生AOL上的均等性约为1年TVR-MACE率,尽管与BMS相比,DES用于更长和更大的病变。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号