...
首页> 外文期刊>SIAM Journal on Computing >An optimal randomized cell prob e lower bound for approximate nearest neighbor searching
【24h】

An optimal randomized cell prob e lower bound for approximate nearest neighbor searching

机译:近似最近邻居搜索的最优随机小区概率下界

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We consider the approximate nearest neighbor search problem on the Hamming cube {0, 1}~d. We show that a randomized cell probe algorithm that uses polynomial storage and word size d~(O(1)) requires a worst case query time of Ω(loglog d/logloglog d). The approximation factor may be as loose as 2~(log 1-nd) for any fixed n ≤ 0. Our result fills a major gap in the study of this problem since all earlier lower bounds either did not allow randomization [A. Chakrabarti et al., A lower bound on the complexity of approximate nearest-neighbor searching on the Hamming cube, in Discrete and Computational Geometry, Springer, Berlin, 2003, pp. 313-328; D. Liu, Inform. Process. Lett., 92 (2004), pp. 23-29] or did not allow approximation [A. Borodin, R. Ostrovsky, and Y. Rabani, Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 1999, pp. 312-321; O. Barkol and Y. Rabani, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2000, pp. 388-396; T. S. Jayram et al., J. Comput. System Sci., 69 (2004), pp. 435-447]. We also give a cell probe algorithm that proves that our lower bound is optimal. Our proof uses a lower bound on the round complexity of the related communicat ion problem. We show, additionally, that considerations of bit complexity alone cannot prove any n ontrivial cell probe lower bound for the problem. This shows that the "richness technique" [P. B. Miltersen et al., J. Comput. System Sci., 57 (1998), pp. 37-49] used in a lot of recent research around this problem would not have helped here. Our proof is based on information theoretic techniques for communication complexity, a theme that has been prominent in recent research [A. Chakrabarti et al., Proceedings of the 42nd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2001, pp. 270-278; Z. Bar-Yossef et al., Proceedings of the 43rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2002, pp. 209-218; P. Sen, Proceedings of the 18th Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, 2003, pp. 73-83; R. Jain, J. Radhakrishnan, and P. Sen, Proceedings of the 30th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming, 2003, pp. 300-315].
机译:我们考虑汉明立方体{0,1}〜d上的近似最近邻搜索问题。我们表明,使用多项式存储和字长d〜(O(1))的随机单元探测算法需要最坏情况的查询时间Ω(loglog d / logloglog d)。对于任何固定的n≤0,逼近因子可能松散到2〜(log 1nd)。我们的结果填补了该问题研究的主要空白,因为所有较早的下限都不允许随机化[A. Chakrabarti等人,《离散和计算几何》,Springer,柏林,2003年,第313-328页;在汉明立方体上近似最近邻搜索的复杂性的下界。 D. Liu,通知。处理。 Lett。,92(2004),pp。23-29]或不允许近似[A. Borodin,R。Ostrovsky和Y. Rabani,第31届ACM计算理论年度研讨会论文集,1999年,第312-321页; O. Barkol和Y. Rabani,第32届ACM计算理论年度研讨会论文集,2000年,第388-396页; T.S.Jayram等人,J.Comput。系统科学杂志,69(2004),第435-447页。我们还给出了一个细胞探针算法,该算法证明我们的下界是最佳的。我们的证明对相关通信问题的复杂度使用了下限。此外,我们表明,仅考虑比特复杂性并不能证明该问题的任何普通蜂窝探针下限。这表明“丰富技术” [P. B.Miltersen等人,J.Comput。 [System Sci。,57(1998),pp。37-49]在有关此问题的许多最新研究中都没有用。我们的证明是基于信息理论技术解决通信复杂性的,这一主题在最近的研究中一直很突出[A. Chakrabarti等人,“第42届IEEE计算机科学基础年度研讨会论文集”,2001年,第270-278页; Z. Bar-Yossef等人,第43届IEEE计算机科学基础年度研讨会论文集,2002年,第209-218页; P. Sen,第18届IEEE计算复杂性年度会议论文集,2003年,第73-83页; R. Jain,J。Radhakrishnan和P. Sen,第30届自动机,语言和编程国际学术会议论文集,2003年,第300-315页]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号