首页> 外文期刊>Separation and Purification Technology >Coagulation performance and floc characteristics of polytitanium tetrachloride and titanium tetrachloride compared with ferric chloride for coal mining wastewater treatment
【24h】

Coagulation performance and floc characteristics of polytitanium tetrachloride and titanium tetrachloride compared with ferric chloride for coal mining wastewater treatment

机译:聚四氯化钛和四氯化钛与氯化铁相比的混凝性能和絮凝特性对煤矿废水的处理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The production and discharge of large volumes of wastewater during coal mining activities are one of the major environmental issues in Australia. Therefore, it is crucial to develop and optimise effective treatment processes for the safe disposal of coal mining wastewater (CMWW). In this study, we investigated the performance of a recently developed polytitanium tetrachloride (PTC) coagulant and compared with the performance of titanium tetrachloride (TiCl4) and the commonly used ferric chloride (FeCl3) coagulant for the treatment of CMWW from one of the coal mining sites in Australia. The use of Ti-based coagulants is particularly attractive for the CMWW treatment due to the advantage of being able to recycle the sludge to produce functional titanium dioxide (TiO2) photocatalyst; unlike the flocs formed using conventional coagulants, which need to be disposed in landfill sites. The results showed that both PTC and TiCl4 performed better than FeCl3 in terms of turbidity, UV254 and inorganic compounds (e.g. aluminium, copper or zinc) removal, however, PTC performed poorly in terms of dissolved organic carbon removal (i.e. less than 10%). While charge neutralisation and bridging adsorption were the main coagulation mechanisms identified for TiCl4 treatment; sweep coagulation and bridging adsorption seemed to play a more important role for both PTC and FeCl3 treatments. The flocs formed by PTC coagulation achieved the largest floc size of around 900 mu m with the highest floc growth rate. Both Ti-based coagulants (i.e., PTC and TiCl4) showed higher strength factor than FeCl3, while TiCl4 coagulant yielded the flocs with the highest recovery factor. This study indicates that Ti-based coagulants are effective and promising coagulants for the treatment of CMWW. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:煤炭开采活动中大量废水的产生和排放是澳大利亚的主要环境问题之一。因此,开发和优化有效处理工艺以安全处置煤矿废水(CMWW)至关重要。在这项研究中,我们调查了最近开发的聚四氯化钛(PTC)混凝剂的性能,并与四氯化钛(TiCl4)和常用的三氯化铁(FeCl3)混凝剂的性能进行了比较,该混凝剂用于处理其中一个煤矿的CMWW。澳大利亚的网站。由于能够回收污泥以生产功能性二氧化钛(TiO2)光催化剂,因此使用Ti基凝结剂对CMWW处理特别有吸引力。与使用常规混凝剂形成的絮状物不同,絮凝剂需要放置在垃圾填埋场中。结果表明,PTC和TiCl4的浊度,UV254和无机化合物(例如铝,铜或锌)的去除性能均优于FeCl3,但是PTC的溶解有机碳去除性能较差(即低于10%) 。电荷中和和桥联吸附是TiCl4处理的主要凝结机理。扫描凝结和桥联吸附似乎对PTC和FeCl3处理都起着更重要的作用。通过PTC凝结形成的絮状物达到最大絮状物尺寸,约为900微米,絮状物生长速率最高。两种钛基凝结剂(即PTC和TiCl4)均显示出比FeCl3高的强度因子,而TiCl4凝结剂产生的絮凝物具有最高的回收率。这项研究表明,钛基凝结剂对于治疗CMWW是有效和有前途的凝结剂。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号