...
首页> 外文期刊>Cerebrovascular diseases >Angiographic pattern of symptomatic severe M1 stenosis: comparison with presenting symptoms, infarct patterns, perfusion status, and outcome after recanalization.
【24h】

Angiographic pattern of symptomatic severe M1 stenosis: comparison with presenting symptoms, infarct patterns, perfusion status, and outcome after recanalization.

机译:有症状的严重M1狭窄的血管造影模式:与出现症状,梗塞模式,灌注状态和再通后的结局进行比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Several angiographic patterns distal to severe M1 stenosis have been identified. We have assessed the relationship between these angiographic patterns and patient presenting symptoms, infarct patterns, perfusion status and outcome after recanalization. METHODS: Three angiographic patterns were retrospectively identified in 60 patients (M:F = 41:19; age range = 34-80 years, mean = 55) who underwent M1 stenting: (1) a normal pattern (n = 22); (2) a shift pattern of the borderzone of the anterior cerebral artery (ACA) and middle cerebral artery (MCA) down to the MCA side with decreased size of MCA branches (n = 16), and (3) a dilatation pattern of the MCA branches with slow flow and minimal shift of borderzone (n = 22). In addition, to analyze interreader agreement, we assessed the correlation between angiographic patterns and gender, presenting symptoms (stroke vs. TIA), infarct patterns on MRI (borderzone vs. non-borderzone infarcts), perfusion results and outcome after stenting by chi(2) or Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Blind review revealed an excellent interreader agreement in the assessment of angiographic patterns (kappa = 0.681). The shift pattern was more common in women than in men (p = 0.007). The likelihood of stroke (25/60, 42%, p = 0.001), borderzone infarct (21/32, 66%, p = 0.010) and decreased perfusion (p < 0.001) were greatest in the dilatation pattern, followed by shift and normal patterns. The outcomes did not differ by angiographic pattern probably due to the low event rate (4/60, 6.7%) within 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe M1 stenosis had 3 different angiographic patterns, which correlated with presenting symptoms, infarct patterns and perfusion status. Differences in patterns may be related to variation in collateral circulation at the ACA-MCA borderzone and hypoperfusion status.
机译:背景:已经确定了严重M1狭窄远端的几种血管造影模式。我们评估了这些血管造影模式与患者出现症状,梗死模式,灌注状态和再通后结局之间的关系。方法:回顾性分析了60例行M1支架置入术的患者(M:F = 41:19;年龄范围= 34-80岁,平均= 55)的血管造影模式:(1)正常模式(n = 22); (2)大脑前动脉(ACA)和大脑中动脉(MCA)的边界带向下移动到MCA侧,MCA分支的大小减小(n = 16),并且(3)大脑的扩张模式MCA分支缓慢流动,边界区移动最小(n = 22)。此外,为了分析阅读者之间的一致性,我们评估了血管造影术模式与性别之间的相关性,表现出的症状(中风vs.TIA),MRI上的梗塞模式(边界区与非边界区梗死),灌注结果以及经支架置入后的灌注结果( 2)或费舍尔的精确测试。结果:盲法审查显示,在血管造影模式评估中,阅读者之间的一致性很高(kappa = 0.681)。女性的转换模式比男性更常见(p = 0.007)。在扩张模式中,中风(25/60,42%,p = 0.001),边界区梗塞(21/32,66%,p = 0.010)和灌注减少(p <0.001)的可能性最大,其次是移位和正常模式。血管造影的结果无差异,可能是由于6个月内事件发生率较低(4/60,6.7%)。结论:重度M1狭窄的患者有3种不同的血管造影照片,与表现症状,梗塞样式和灌注状态相关。模式的差异可能与ACA-MCA边界区侧支循环的变化和灌注不足状态有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号