...
首页> 外文期刊>Cerebrovascular diseases >High Blood Pressure in Acute Ischaemic Stroke - Broadening Therapeutic Horizons
【24h】

High Blood Pressure in Acute Ischaemic Stroke - Broadening Therapeutic Horizons

机译:急性缺血性卒中的高血压-拓宽治疗视野

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

High blood pressure (BP) is present in 80% of patients with acute ischaemic stroke and is independently associated with poor outcome. Although this epidemiology suggests that BP should be lowered acutely, concerns about dysfunctional cerebral autoregulation suggest otherwise. Several small randomised trials have assessed cerebral blood flow with various antihypertensive classes and agents in acute ischaemic stroke. Overall, these studies showed no change in cerebral perfusion, although the numbers of studies and patients are limited and there are methodological problems with some trials. There are no large published randomised trials assessing outcome with BP lowering in acute stroke. Calcium channel blockers did not alter outcome after ischaemic stroke (29 trials, 7,665 patients). However, some trials, especially those testing intravenous calcium channel blockers (INWEST) or oral (3-receptor antagonists (BEST) reported real or potential hazard. In contrast, oral candesartan reduced combined vascular events in 339 patients with ischaemic stroke (ACCESS) although it had no effect on disability. The CHHIPS trial found that death was reduced in patients randomised to active treatment (labetalol, lisinopril) as compared with placebo. Two larger trials reported that glucose-potassium-insulin therapy (GIST) or magnesium (IMAGES) lowered BP but had no effect on functional outcome. The INTERACT pilot trial studied patients with intracerebral haemorrhage and found that an intensive BP-lowering regime non-significantly reduced haematoma expansion. There are four large ongoing trials examining whether to continue or stop pre-stroke antihypertensive therapy (COS-SACS, ENOS) or lower BP in acute stroke (ENOS, SCAST) or haemorrhage (INTERACT 2).
机译:高血压(BP)存在于80%的急性缺血性中风患者中,并且与不良预后独立相关。尽管这种流行病学表明应紧急降低血压,但对脑自动调节功能异常的担忧则相反。几项小型随机试验评估了急性缺血性卒中中各种降压药和药物的脑血流量。总体而言,尽管研究和患者数量有限并且某些试验存在方法学问题,但这些研究显示脑灌注没有变化。尚无大型发表的随机试验评估急性卒中时血压降低的结果。缺血性中风后钙通道阻滞剂未改变预后(29项试验,7,665名患者)。然而,一些试验,特别是那些测试静脉内钙通道阻滞剂(INWEST)或口服(3-受体拮抗剂(BEST))的试验报告有实际或潜在危险。相比之下,口服坎地沙坦可减少339例缺血性中风(ACCESS)患者的合并血管事件CHHIPS试验发现,与安慰剂相比,随机接受积极治疗(拉贝洛尔,赖诺普利)的患者的死亡率降低;两项较大的试验报道,葡萄糖-钾-胰岛素疗法(GIST)或镁(IMAGES) INTERACT试点研究对脑出血患者进行研究,发现强化降压方案无明显降低血肿扩大的趋势,目前有四项大型试验正在研究是否继续或停止卒中急性中风(ENOS,SCAST)或出血(INTERACT 2)的降压治疗(COS-SACS,ENOS)或较低的BP。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号