...
首页> 外文期刊>Cerebrovascular diseases >Pre-Stroke Use of Beta-Blockers Does Not Lower Post-Stroke Infection Rate: An Exploratory Analysis of the Preventive Antibiotics in Stroke Study
【24h】

Pre-Stroke Use of Beta-Blockers Does Not Lower Post-Stroke Infection Rate: An Exploratory Analysis of the Preventive Antibiotics in Stroke Study

机译:中风前使用β受体阻滞剂不能降低中风后感染率:中风研究中预防性抗生素的探索性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: Stroke-associated infections occur frequently and are associated with unfavorable outcome. Previous cohort studies suggest a protective effect of beta-blockers (BBs) against infections. A sympathetic drive may increase immune suppression and infections. Aim: This study is aimed at investigating the association between BB treatment at baseline and post-stroke infection in the Preventive Antibiotics in Stroke Study (PASS), a prospective clinical trial. Methods: We performed an exploratory analysis in PASS, 2,538 patients with acute phase of stroke (24 h after onset) were randomized to ceftriaxone (intravenous, 2 g per day for 4 days) in addition to stroke unit care, or standard stroke unit care without preventive antibiotic treatment. All clinical data, including use of BBs, was prospectively collected. Infection was diagnosed by the treating physician, and independently by an expert panel blinded for all other data. Multivariable analysis was performed to investigate the relation between BB treatment and infection rate. Results: Infection, as defined by the physician, occurred in 348 of 2,538 patients (14%). Multivariable analysis showed that the use of BBs at baseline was associated with the development of infection during clinical course (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.61, 95% CI 1.19-2.18; p < 0.01). BB use at baseline was also associated with the development of pneumonia (aOR 1.56, 95% CI 1.05-2.30; p = 0.03). Baseline BB use was not associated with mortality (aOR 1.14, 95% CI 0.84-1.53; p = 0.41) or unfavorable outcome at 3 months (aOR 1.10, 95% CI 0.89-1.35; p = 0.39). Conclusions: Patients treated with BBs prior to stroke have a higher rate of infection and pneumonia. (C) 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel
机译:背景:中风相关的感染经常发生,并伴有不良后果。先前的队列研究表明,β-受体阻滞剂(BBs)对感染具有保护作用。有同情心的驱动器可能会增加免疫抑制和感染。目的:本研究旨在通过一项前瞻性临床研究“卒中预防性抗生素研究”(PASS)研究基线BB治疗与卒中后感染之间的关系。方法:我们在PASS中进行了一项探索性分析,除卒中单位护理或标准卒中单位护理外,将2538例急性中风期(发病后24小时)患者随机分配到头孢曲松钠(静脉注射,每天2 g,共4天)无需预防性抗生素治疗。前瞻性收集了所有临床数据,包括BB的使用。感染是由主治医生诊断的,并由对所有其他数据不知情的专家小组独立诊断。进行多变量分析以研究BB治疗与感染率之间的关系。结果:按照医生的定义,在2538例患者中有348例发生了感染(14%)。多变量分析显示,基线时使用BBs与临床过程中感染的发展有关(校正OR(aOR)1.61,95%CI 1.19-2.18; p <0.01)。基线时使用BB也与肺炎的发生有关(aOR 1.56,95%CI 1.05-2.30; p = 0.03)。基线BB的使用与死亡率(aOR 1.14,95%CI 0.84-1.53​​; p = 0.41)或在3个月时的不良预后无关(aOR 1.10,95%CI 0.89-1.35; p = 0.39)。结论:卒中前接受BBs治疗的患者感染和肺炎的发生率更高。 (C)2016 S.Karger AG,巴塞尔

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号