首页> 外文期刊>Cerebrovascular diseases >Safety and therapeutical benefit of hemicraniectomy combined with mild hypothermia in comparison with hemicraniectomy alone in patients with malignant ischemic stroke.
【24h】

Safety and therapeutical benefit of hemicraniectomy combined with mild hypothermia in comparison with hemicraniectomy alone in patients with malignant ischemic stroke.

机译:与恶性缺血性脑卒中患者单独半颅切除术相比,半颅切除术联合轻度低温治疗的安全性和疗效。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Both for hemicraniectomy and for hypothermia, several reports describe a beneficial effect in patients with malignant supratentorial cerebral ischemia. We compared the safety and the clinical outcome in patients with a malignant supratentorial infarction who were treated with hemicraniectomy alone (HA) or received a combination therapy with hemicraniectomy and hypothermia of 35 degrees C (HH), respectively. METHODS: In a prospective and randomized study, 25 consecutive patients were treated after an ischemic infarction of more than two thirds of one hemisphere by HA (n=13 patients) or the HH combination therapy (n=12 patients). Safety parameters were compared between both treatment groups, the clinical outcome was assessed during treatment and after 6 months. RESULTS: Age, cranial CT or MRI findings, initial National institutes of Health Stroke Scale Score (NIHSSS) and level of consciousness were not significantly different between both groups. Hemicraniectomy was performed within 15+/- 6h after the ischemic event. Hypothermia was induced immediately after surgery. Overall mortality was 12% (2/13 vs. 1/12 in the two groups), but none of these 3 patients died due to treatment-related complications. There were no severe side effects of hypothermia. Duration of need for intensive care or for mechanical ventilation and infectious status did not differ significantly between both groups, but the need for catecholamine application was increased in the HH group. The clinical outcome showed a tendency for a better outcome in the HH compared with the HA group with respect to status after 6 months, as assessed by the NIHSSS (10+/-1 vs. 11+/-3, p<0.08). DISCUSSION: The present study suggests that a combined therapy of mild hypothermia and hemicraniectomy in malignant brain infarction does not imply additional risks by side effects and improves functional outcome as compared with hemicraniectomy alone.
机译:简介:对于半颅脑切除术和体温过低,有几篇报道描述了对恶性幕上性脑缺血患者的有益作用。我们比较了单独行半颅切除术(HA)或接受过半颅切除术和35度低温(HH)联合治疗的恶性幕上梗死患者的安全性和临床结局。方法:在一项前瞻性和随机研究中,通过HA(n = 13例)或HH联合疗法(n = 12例)在缺血性脑梗塞超过半球的三分之二后,连续治疗了25例患者。比较两个治疗组之间的安全性参数,评估治疗期间和6个月后的临床结局。结果:两组的年龄,颅脑CT或MRI表现,最初的美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分(NIHSSS)和意识水平均无显着差异。缺血事件发生后15 +/- 6小时内进行半颅切除术。手术后立即引起体温过低。总死亡率为12%(两组分别为2/13和1/12),但是这3例患者中没有一例因治疗相关并发症而死亡。体温过低没有严重的副作用。两组之间的重症监护或机械通气和感染状况的持续时间没有显着差异,但HH组增加了儿茶酚胺的使用。根据NIHSSS的评估,就6个月后的状态而言,与HA组相比,HH的临床结局倾向于更好的结局趋势(10 +/- 1对11 +/- 3,p <0.08)。讨论:本研究表明,与仅进行半颅脑切除术相比,轻度低温和半颅脑切除术在恶性脑梗死中的联合治疗并不意味着副作用更大,并且改善了功能预后。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号